Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959495›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

A Novel Model Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Improves Diagnostic Accuracy of Intramucosal Gastric Cancer (With Video).

Dehua Tang, Jie Zhou, Lei Wang, Muhan Ni, Min Chen, Shahzeb Hassan, Renquan Luo, Xi Chen, Xinqi He, Lihui Zhang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dehua TangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Muhan NiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Min ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Shahzeb HassanNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Renquan LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xinqi HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Lihui ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiwei DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Honggang YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Guifang XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoping ZouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CNWuhan University · CNNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPrediction of intramucosal gastric cancer (GC) is a big challenge. It is not clear whether artificial intelligence could assist endoscopists in the diagnosis.

methodsA deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) model was developed

resultsThe DCNN model discriminated intramucosal GC from advanced GC with an AUC of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.915-0.970), a sensitivity of 90.5% (95% CI, 84.1%-95.4%), and a specificity of 85.3% (95% CI, 77.1%-90.9%) in the testing dataset. The diagnostic performance of novice endoscopists was comparable to those of expert endoscopists with the DCNN model's assistance (accuracy: 84.6%

conclusionsAn AI-assisted system was established and found useful for novice endoscopists to achieve comparable diagnostic performance with experts.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep convolutional neural networkdepth of invasionendoscopic resectiongastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID33959495
PMCPMC8095170
OpenAlexW3153815666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.