ReviewCureus2021
Mortality in Acromegalic Patients: Etiology, Trends, and Risk Factors.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Importance of the early diagnosis of acromegaly. Evolution of mandibular growth and dental occlusion in a case with a late diagnosis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Effects of Treatment on Structural and Functional Parameters of the Left Heart in Naïve Acromegaly Patients: Prospective Single-Centre Study: 12-Month Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- GIP Receptor Antagonism Eliminates Paradoxical Growth Hormone Secretion in Some Patients With Acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in Cushing's disease and Acromegaly: A clinical perspective and algorithms proposal.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Prescription patterns of somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2023Article
- Interpreting growth hormone and IGF-I results using modern assays and reference ranges for the monitoring of treatment effectiveness in acromegaly.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although acromegaly has been associated with increased mortality rates, evidence shows that the application of the recent treatment modalities has reduced the risk of death in these patients, being comparable with the general population. As a result of the changing trends regarding mortality, the aim is to review the current literature to create enough evidence about the recent trends of mortality in patients with acromegaly. Moreover, this review aims to identify the possible etiology and the related risk factors. Old studies have reported that cardiovascular complications were the major etiology for death among acromegalic patients. However, recent studies showed that malignancies-induced complications might be the leading factor, while other studies reported that cardiovascular complications are still the main culprit. Nonetheless, the recently estimated risk is similar to that in the general population. Studies reported a decrease in mortality rates among patients with acromegaly within the last decades, which is probably attributable to the recent changes in the management updates, the less frequent exposure to radiotherapy and focus on the common cardiovascular disorders associated with the disease. This review also found that exposure to radiotherapy, old age, hypopituitarism, active acromegaly, and high growth hormone (GH) levels are significant predictors of mortality in acromegalic patients. In conclusion, more effort should be made to decrease GH to favorable levels based on the recent guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.