Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959357›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Girding the loins? Direct evidence of the use of a medieval English parchment birthing girdle from biomolecular analysis.

Sarah Fiddyment, Natalie J Goodison, Elma Brenner, Stefania Signorello, Kierri Price, Matthew J Collins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  8. A primer for ZooMS applications in archaeology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah FiddymentThe McDonald Institute, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8991-2318
Natalie J GoodisonThe Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Elma BrennerWellcome Collection, 183 Euston Road, Bloomsbury, London NW1 2BE, UK.
Stefania SignorelloWellcome Collection, 183 Euston Road, Bloomsbury, London NW1 2BE, UK.
Kierri PriceWellcome Collection, 183 Euston Road, Bloomsbury, London NW1 2BE, UK.
Matthew J CollinsThe McDonald Institute, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4226-5501
Wellcome Collection · GBDurham University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we describe palaeoproteomic evidence obtained from a stained medieval birth girdle using a previously developed dry non-invasive sampling technique. The parchment birth girdle studied (Wellcome Collection Western MS. 632) was made in England in the late fifteenth century and was thought to be used by pregnant women while giving birth. We were able to extract both human and non-human peptides from the manuscript, including evidence for the use of honey, cereals, ovicaprine milk and legumes. In addition, a large number of human peptides were detected on the birth roll, many of which are found in cervico-vaginal fluid. This suggests that the birth roll was actively used during childbirth. This study is, to our knowledge, the first to extract and analyse non-collagenous peptides from a birth girdle using this sampling method and demonstrates the potential of this type of analysis for stained manuscripts, providing direct biomolecular evidence for active use.

Indexed as

birth girdlemedievalparchmentproteomicsstains

Identifiers

PMID33959357
PMCPMC8074970
OpenAlexW3135866773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.