Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959331›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Angiogenic property of silk fibroin scaffolds with adipose-derived stem cells on chick chorioallantoic membrane.

Tanapong Watchararot, Weerapong Prasongchean, Peerapat Thongnuek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Silk fibroin scaffolds: A promising candidate for bone regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Protein-Based 3D Biofabrication of Biomaterials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanapong WatchararotDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Weerapong PrasongcheanDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Peerapat ThongnuekBiomedical Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9074-784X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis is a crucial step in tissue regeneration and repair. Biomaterials that allow or promote angiogenesis are thus beneficial. In this study, angiogenic properties of salt-leached silk fibroin (SF) scaffolds seeded with human adipose stem cells (hADSCs) were studied using chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as a model. The hADSC-seeded SF scaffolds (SF-hADSC) with the porosity of 77.34 ± 6.96% and the pore diameter of 513.95 ± 4.99 µm were implanted on the CAM of chick embryos that were on an embryonic day 8 (E8) of development. The SF-hADSC scaffolds induced a spoke-wheel pattern of capillary network indicative of angiogenesis, which was evident since E11. Moreover, the ingrowth of blood vessels into the scaffolds was seen in histological sections. The unseeded scaffolds induced the same extent of angiogenesis later on E14. By contrast, the control group could not induce the same extent of angiogenesis.

Indexed as

adipose-derived stem cellsangiogenesisangioirritationchick chorioallantoic membranescaffoldssilk fibroin

Identifiers

PMID33959331
PMCPMC8074929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.