Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959330›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

A comparative test of the gamete dynamics theory for the evolution of anisogamy in Bryopsidales green algae.

Tatsuya Togashi, Yusuke Horinouchi, Geoff A Parker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tatsuya TogashiMarine Biosystems Research Center, Chiba University, Kamogawa 299-5502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9270-9863
Yusuke HorinouchiMarine Biosystems Research Center, Chiba University, Kamogawa 299-5502, Japan.
Geoff A ParkerDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4795-6352
Chiba University · JPUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamete dynamics theory proposes that anisogamy arises by disruptive selection for gamete numbers versus gamete size and predicts that female/male gamete size (anisogamy ratio) increases with adult size and complexity. Evidence has been that in volvocine green algae, the anisogamy ratio correlates positively with haploid colony size. However, green algae show notable exceptions. We focus on Bryopsidales green algae. While some taxa have a diplontic life cycle in which a diploid adult (=fully grown) stage arises directly from the zygote, many taxa have a haplodiplontic life cycle in which haploid adults develop indirectly: the zygote first develops into a diploid adult (sporophyte) which later undergoes meiosis and releases zoospores, each growing into a haploid adult gametophyte. Our comparative analyses suggest that, as theory predicts: (i) male gametes are minimized, (ii) female gamete sizes vary, probably optimized by number versus survival as zygotes, and (iii) the anisogamy ratio correlates positively with diploid (but not haploid) stage complexity. However, there was no correlation between the anisogamy ratio and diploid adult stage size. Increased environmental severity (water depth) appears to drive increased diploid adult stage complexity and anisogamy ratio: gamete dynamics theory correctly predicts that anisogamy evolves with the (diploid) stage directly provisioned by the zygote.

Indexed as

Baker and Smith's modelChlorophyceaedisruptive selectiongamete sizemeiotic progenyParkerUlvophyceae

Identifiers

PMID33959330
PMCPMC8074922
OpenAlexW3134788134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.