Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959285›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2021

Grow or go? Energetic constraints on shark pup dispersal from pupping areas.

M N McMillan, J M Semmens, C Huveneers, D W Sims, K M Stehfest, B M Gillanders

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M N McMillanSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, & Environment Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.
J M SemmensFisheries and Aquaculture Centre, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Taroona 7053, Australia.
C HuveneersSouthern Shark Ecology Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.
D W SimsMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK.
K M StehfestFisheries and Aquaculture Centre, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Taroona 7053, Australia.
B M GillandersSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, & Environment Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many sharks and other marine taxa use natal areas to maximize survival of young, meaning such areas are often attributed conservation value. The use of natal areas is often linked to predator avoidance or food resources. However, energetic constraints that may influence dispersal of young and their use of natal areas are poorly understood. We combined swim-tunnel respirometry, calorimetry, lipid class analysis and a bioenergetics model to investigate how energy demands influence dispersal of young in a globally distributed shark. The school shark (a.k.a. soupfin, tope),

Indexed as

Connectivitycost of transportmarine-protected areasmetabolic ratenursery areasontogenetic habitat shift

Identifiers

PMID33959285
PMCPMC8084043
OpenAlexW3157560580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.