Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959269›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2021

Sex differences in the vascular access of hemodialysis patients: a cohort study.

Jennifer M MacRae, Alix Clarke, Sofia B Ahmed, Meghan Elliott, Rob R Quinn, Matthew James, Kathryn King-Shier, Swapnil Hiremath, Matthew J Oliver, Brenda Hemmelgarn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-Specific Outcomes in the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jennifer M MacRaeDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alix ClarkeDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sofia B AhmedDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Meghan ElliottDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Rob R QuinnDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Matthew JamesDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kathryn King-ShierFaculty of Nursing and Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Swapnil HiremathDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Matthew J OliverDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brenda HemmelgarnDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nairne Scott-DouglasDivision of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Pietro RavaniLibin Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alberta Kidney Disease Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe describe differences for probability of receiving a fistula attempt, achieving fistula use, remaining catheter-free and the rate of access-related procedures as a function of sex.

methodsProspectively collected vascular access data on incident dialysis patients from five Canadian programs using the Dialysis Measurement Analysis and Reporting System to determine differences in fistula-related outcomes between women and men. The probability of receiving a fistula attempt and the probability of fistula use were determined using binary logistic regression. Catheter and fistula procedure rates were described using Poisson regression. We studied time to fistula attempt and time to fistula use, accounting for competing risks.

resultsWe included 1446 (61%) men and 929 (39%) women. Men had a lower body mass index (P < 0.001) and were more likely to have coronary artery disease (P < 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001). A total of 688 (48%) men and 403 (43%) women received a fistula attempt. Women were less likely to receive a fistula attempt by 6 months {odds ratio [OR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.79]} and to achieve catheter-free use of their fistula by 1 year [OR 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.53)]. At an average of 2.30 access procedures per person-year, there is no difference between women and men [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.97 (95% CI 0.87-1.07)]. Restricting to those with a fistula attempt, women received more procedures [IRR 1.16 (95% CI 1.04-1.30)] attributed to increased catheter procedures [IRR 1.50 (95% CI 1.27-1.78)]. There was no difference in fistula procedures [IRR women versus men 0.96 (95% CI 0.85-1.07)].

conclusionCompared with men, fewer women undergo a fistula attempt. This disparity increases after adjusting for comorbidities. Women have the same number of fistula procedures as men but are less likely to successfully use their fistula.

Indexed as

catheterfistulahemodialysissex differencesvascular access

Identifiers

PMID33959269
PMCPMC8087139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.