Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959261›Full record

ReviewJournal of global health2021

Current COVID-19 treatments: Rapid review of the literature.

Yijia Dong, Azwa Shamsuddin, Harry Campbell, Evropi Theodoratou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of favipiravir in adults with mild COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Corticosteroids in COVID-19: pros and cons.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. COVID-19 Treatment-Current Status, Advances, and Gap.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Fostering New Scientific Networks in the COVID Era and Beyond.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Early high-titer convalescent plasma therapy in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. sRAGE alleviates SARS-CoV-2-induced pneumonia in hamster.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yijia DongEdinburgh Medical School, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Azwa ShamsuddinCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harry CampbellCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Evropi TheodoratouCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs SARS-CoV-2 continues to spread worldwide, it has already resulted in over 110 million cases and 2.5 million deaths. Currently, there are no effective COVID-19 treatments, although numerous studies are under way. SARS-CoV-2, however, is not the first coronavirus to cause serious outbreaks. COVID-19 can be compared with previous human coronavirus diseases, such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), to better understand the development of treatments.

methodsDatabases Medline, Embase and WHO COVID-19 was systematically searched on 9 February 2021 for studies reporting on therapeutic effect of COVID-19 treatments. Clinical trials, case reports, observational studies and systematic reviews in the English language were eligible.

results1416 studies were identified and 40 studies were included in this review. Therapies included are: remdesivir, convalescent plasma, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ ritonavir, interferon, corticosteroids, cytokine storm inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Remdesivir, convalescent plasma and interferon seems to provide some clinical benefits such as faster recovery time and reduced mortality, but these effects are not clinically significant. Some corticosteroids are effective in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. Hydroxychloroquine do not convey any beneficial, and therapies such as cytokine storm inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies were also not effective and require further investigation.

conclusionsThere is no single therapy effective against COVID-19. However, a combination of therapies administered at different stages of infection may provide some benefit. This conclusion is reflected in the limited effects of these treatments in previous human coronaviruses.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID33959261
PMCPMC8068411
OpenAlexW3158528877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.