ArticleTanaffos2020
Postural Balance Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Tanaffos, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Updated Perspectives on the Role of Biomechanics in COPD: Considerations for the Clinician.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of falling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is higher than healthy people, imposing a great financial burden on patients due to clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to compare static balance between two groups of healthy people and COPD patients, based on cognitive tasks and vision tests, using linear and non-linear analyses. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 15 patients with COPD and 14 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals were recruited in this study. Variations in the center of pressure were recorded in both medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions by implementing visual feedback and cognitive tasks, with the subject standing on a force plate. Data related to the center of pressure were analyzed in the AP and ML directions by linear methods (i.e., standard deviation of displacement, standard deviation of maximum velocity, average velocity, and phase plane). Also, the nonlinear method (Lyapunov exponents) was used in both directions.
resultsThe cognitive tasks improved the center of pressure variables in both groups. In association with the vision tests, only lack of vision had a significant effect on the patients. The results of the linear analysis in the ML direction were significantly higher in the COPD group as compared to the healthy group; however, the results were not significant in the AP direction. Also, the non-linear analysis showed significant differences between the groups.
conclusionUse of both linear and non-linear analyses is necessary for evaluating the balance of patients with breathing difficulties. Balance disorders in COPD patients were mostly in the ML direction; therefore, postural deformities might be one of the reasons for balance problems in the AP direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33959178PMC8088140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.