ArticleTanaffos2020
Clinical Utility of Red Cell Distribution Width in Patients with Pleural Effusion.
Article in Tanaffos, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe red cell distribution width (RDW) value has been recently recognized as a valuable biomarker in clinical practice. The RDW value has not been evaluated so far in patients with pleural effusion. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether RDW could distinguish between exudative and transudative pleural effusions. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe measured protein and lactate dehydrogenase levels on both pleural fluids and serum samples from 223 cases and classified them as transudates or exudates based on the classic Light's criteria. We collected blood cell count elements such as RDW from the medical records. We also investigated the correlation between RDW and the nature of pleural effusion.
resultsIn 55.2% of the patients, pleural fluid was exudative. Although we found no significant association between RDW and the nature of the pleural fluid, we detected a significantly higher amount of RDW (14.9 ≤) in patients with exudative pleural effusion compared to transudate (66.7% vs. 33.3%; P= 0.01). In this category, neoplastic conditions were mostly observed in the patients (76.3%), followed by pulmonary thromboembolism (21.1%) and systemic lupus erythematous (2.6%).
conclusionThe findings could not reveal any noticeable correlation between RDW and the Light criteria. However, it appears that elevated RDW levels give insights into the valuable nature of RDW in different conditions such as neoplastic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33959174PMC8088153W3157365272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.