ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
Metagenomic Geolocation Prediction Using an Adaptive Ensemble Classifier.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring extreme environments in Türkiye for novel P450s through metagenomic analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Towards predicting the geographical origin of ancient samples with metagenomic data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Microbiome Identification of Forensically Relevant Biological Fluids: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- CAMDA 2023: Finding patterns in urban microbiomes.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Prediction of Smoking Habits From Class-Imbalanced Saliva Microbiome Data Using Data Augmentation and Machine Learning.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome samples harvested from urban environments can be informative in predicting the geographic location of unknown samples. The idea that different cities may have geographically disparate microbial signatures can be utilized to predict the geographical location based on city-specific microbiome samples. We implemented this idea first; by utilizing standard bioinformatics procedures to pre-process the raw metagenomics samples provided by the CAMDA organizers. We trained several component classifiers and a robust ensemble classifier with data generated from taxonomy-dependent and taxonomy-free approaches. Also, we implemented class weighting and an optimal oversampling technique to overcome the class imbalance in the primary data. In each instance, we observed that the component classifiers performed differently, whereas the ensemble classifier consistently yielded optimal performance. Finally, we predicted the source cities of mystery samples provided by the organizers. Our results highlight the unreliability of restricting the classification of metagenomic samples to source origins to a single classification algorithm. By combining several component classifiers via the ensemble approach, we obtained classification results that were as good as the best-performing component classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.