Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958781›Full record

ReviewNature genetics2021

Advancing crop genomics from lab to field.

Michael D Purugganan, Scott A Jackson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hybrid origin and phenotype evolution of the modern maize.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Special Issue: "Molecular Genetics and Plant Breeding, 5th Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Special Issue "Molecular Genetics and Plant Breeding 3.0 and 4.0".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Advances in Cotton Genomics, Genetics and Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael D PuruggananCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA. mp13@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-4112
Scott A JacksonBayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop genomics remains a key element in ensuring scientific progress to secure global food security. It has been two decades since the sequence of the first plant genome, that of Arabidopsis thaliana, was released, and soon after that the draft sequencing of the rice genome was completed. Since then, the genomes of more than 100 crops have been sequenced, plant genome research has expanded across multiple fronts and the next few years promise to bring further advances spurred by the advent of new technologies and approaches. We are likely to see continued innovations in crop genome sequencing, genetic mapping and the acquisition of multiple levels of biological data. There will be exciting opportunities to integrate genome-scale information across multiple scales of biological organization, leading to advances in our mechanistic understanding of crop biological processes, which will, in turn, provide greater impetus for translation of laboratory results to the field.

Indexed as

GenomicsLaboratoriesChromosome MappingCrops, AgriculturalEpigenesis, GeneticGenome, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.