Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958733›Full record

ReviewGenes and immunity2021

Robust microbe immune recognition in the intestinal mucosa.

Olivier P Schären, Siegfried Hapfelmeier

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes and immunity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Microbiota medicine: towards clinical revolution.Journal of translational medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Olivier P SchärenInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0944-5327
Siegfried HapfelmeierInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. siegfried.hapfelmeier@ifik.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6913-7932
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian mucosal immune system acts as a multitasking mediator between bodily function and a vast diversity of microbial colonists. Depending on host-microbial interaction type, mucosal immune responses have distinct functions. Immunity to pathogen infection functions to limit tissue damage, clear or contain primary infection, and prevent or lower the severity of a secondary infection by conferring specific long-term adaptive immunity. Responses to nonpathogenic commensal or mutualistic microbes instead function to tolerate continuous colonization. Mucosal innate immune and epithelial cells employ a limited repertoire of innate receptors to program the adaptive immune response accordingly. Pathogen versus nonpathogen immune discrimination appears to be very robust, as most individuals successfully maintain life-long mutualism with their nonpathogenic microbiota, while mounting immune defense to pathogenic microbe infection specifically. However, the process is imperfect, which can have immunopathological consequences, but may also be exploited medically. Normally innocuous intestinal commensals in some individuals may drive serious inflammatory autoimmunity, whereas harmless vaccines can be used to fool the immune system into mounting a protective anti-pathogen immune response. In this article, we review the current knowledge on mucosal intestinal bacterial immune recognition focusing on T

Indexed as

Intestinal MucosaMicrobiotaAnimalsHumansImmune SystemImmunity, InnateImmunity, MucosalIntestines

Identifiers

PMID33958733
PMCPMC8497264
OpenAlexW3157579049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.