Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958712›Full record

ReviewJournal of human genetics2021

Genomic landscape of hepatocarcinogenesis.

Tatsuhiro Shibata

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Alteration of Wnt3a overexpression and its early monitoring value during hepatocellular carcinogenesis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  18. Advances in postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary liver cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatsuhiro ShibataLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, The Institute of Medical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. tshibata@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) JP20ck0106547h0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global health issue and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Large-scale HCC genome sequencing analyses have identified core drivers (TERT, TP53, and CTNNB1/AXIN1) as initial molecular events, and other low-frequent drivers that include therapeutically targetable ones. The recent genetic analysis uncovered a distinctive driver gene landscape in precancerous lesions, arguing a discontinuous process at early HCC development. In advanced tumors, intra-tumoral heterogeneity through clonal evolution processes is common, and it displays clear geographic segregation genetically and epigenetically. Diverse epidemiological risk factors for HCC mirrors heterogeneous mutational processes among patient cohorts with distinctive ethnicity, environmental exposures, and lifestyles. The genetic information of individual tumors has been utilized for optimizing treatments, early diagnosis, and monitoring recurrence. It will expand the opportunity for screening high-risk populations, thereby preventing hepatocarcinogenesis in the near future.

Indexed as

GenomicsCarcinogenesisCarcinoma, HepatocellularCohort StudiesGenome, ViralHepatitis B virusHumansJapanLiver NeoplasmsMutation

Identifiers

PMID33958712
OpenAlexW3159834504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.