Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958708›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2021

Hormonal activity in commonly used Black hair care products: evaluating hormone disruption as a plausible contribution to health disparities.

Tamarra James-Todd, Lisa Connolly, Emma V Preston, Marlee R Quinn, Monika Plotan, Yuling Xie, Bharathi Gandi, Shruthi Mahalingaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analyzing the landscape of "clean" products for textured hair at a Los Angeles Target.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tamarra James-Todd *Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. tjtodd@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-5169
Lisa Connolly *Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Emma V PrestonDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Marlee R QuinnDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Monika PlotanInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Yuling XieInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Bharathi GandiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Shruthi MahalingaiahDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

FOLLOW-UP STUDY FOR CAUSES OF ILLNESS IN BLACK WOMENR01CA058420 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 1999 to 2013
$20.7M
Training Program in Environmental EpidemiologyT32ES007069 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI LADEN, FRANCINE · 1985 to 2024
$13.9M
Phthalates, Gestational Diabetes, and Markers of Type 2 Diabetes Risk in WomenR01ES026166 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI JAMES-TODD, TAMARRA M · 2016 to 2021
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058420NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026166NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertain types of hair products are more commonly used by Black women. Studies show hair products contain several endocrine-disrupting chemicals that are associated with adverse health outcomes. As chemical mixtures of endocrine disruptors, hair products may be hormonally active, but this remains unclear.

objectiveTo assess the hormonal activity of commonly used Black hair products.

methodsWe identified six commonly used hair products (used by >10% of the population) from the Greater New York Hair Products Study. We used reporter gene assays (RGAs) incorporating natural steroid receptors to evaluate estrogenic, androgenic, progestogenic, and glucocorticoid hormonal bioactivity employing an extraction method using bond elution prior to RGA assessment at dilutions from 50 to 500.

resultsAll products displayed hormonal activity, varying in the amount and effect. Three samples showed estrogen agonist properties at levels from 12.5 to 20 ng/g estradiol equivalent concentrations All but one sample showed androgen antagonist properties at levels from 20 to 25 ng/g androgen equivalent concentrations. Four samples showed antagonistic and agonistic properties to progesterone and glucocorticoid. SIGNIFICANCE: Hair products commonly used by Black women showed hormonal activity. Given their frequent use, exposure to hormonally active products could have implications for health outcomes and contribute to reproductive and metabolic health disparities.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsHair PreparationsBlack or African AmericanEstrogensFemaleHumansNew YorkEndocrine DisruptorsEstrogensHair PreparationsAndrogen receptorEstrogen receptorGlucocorticoid receptorHair preparationsPersonal care productsProgesterone receptor

Identifiers

PMID33958708
PMCPMC8812815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.