Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958707›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2021

Personal care product use among diverse women in California: Taking Stock Study.

Robin E Dodson, Bethsaida Cardona, Ami R Zota, Janette Robinson Flint, Sandy Navarro, Bhavna Shamasunder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analyzing the landscape of "clean" products for textured hair at a Los Angeles Target.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Young infants' exposure to parabens: lotion use as a potential source of exposure.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anthroposomics: integrating anthropological methods into exposome research.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robin E DodsonSilent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA. dodson@silentspring.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-9511
Bethsaida CardonaSilent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA.
Ami R ZotaDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Janette Robinson FlintBlack Women for Wellness, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sandy NavarroLA Grit Media, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bhavna ShamasunderOccidental College, Urban and Environmental Policy Department, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bhavna@oxy.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal care product use may contribute to elevated body burdens of consumer product chemicals among women of color; however, racial/ethnic differences in product use has been understudied. Community-engaged research can support the recruitment of diverse participants.

objectiveTo document personal care product use among a diverse group of women (aged 18-34 years) living in California.

methodsThrough a community-academic partnership, we surveyed 357 women in California about product use information for 54 cosmetic, hair, menstrual/intimate care, and leave-on and rinse-off personal care products. We compared type and frequency of product use among Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, and White women. We also summarized use of scented products and reasons women select products.

resultsWomen reported using a median of 8 products daily, with some women reporting up to 30 products daily. Hispanic/Latinx and Asian women used more cosmetics, and Black women used more hair and menstrual/intimate products than other women. Of the 54 products compared, there were significant differences in use by race/ethnicity for 28 products, with the largest number of significant differences between Black and White women. SIGNIFICANCE: There is growing information on chemical exposures from personal care products and consequent adverse health effects, with implications for health disparities. Yet, there remains limited information on the range and types of products used by diverse racial/ethnic communities. This study helps close an important gap on product use inventories that can enable more informed public health interventions to limit exposures from personal care products.

Indexed as

CosmeticsWhite PeopleBlack or African AmericanCaliforniaFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansCosmeticsCommunity-based participatory researchEndocrine disrupting chemicalsEnvironmental health disparitiesFragrancePersonal care productsRace/ethnicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.