Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958706›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2021

On the distribution of low-cost PM

Priyanka deSouza, Patrick L Kinney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Disparities in fine particulate matter (PMEnvironmental research, health : ERH · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Hourly PMACS ES&T air · 2026
    Article
  7. PurpleAir Sensor Deployment Trends and Uncertainties.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Equity in the Distribution of Regulatory PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka deSouzaDepartment of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. desouzap@mit.edu.
Patrick L KinneyDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-cost sensors have the potential to democratize air pollution information and supplement regulatory networks. However, differentials in access to these sensors could exacerbate existing inequalities in the ability of different communities to respond to the threat of air pollution.

objectiveOur goal was to analyze patterns of deployments of a commonly used low-cost sensor, as a function of demographics and pollutant concentrations.

methodsWe used Wilcoxon rank sum tests to assess differences between socioeconomic characteristics and PM

resultsCensus tracts with low-cost sensors were higher income more White and more educated than the US as a whole and than tracts with regulatory monitors. For all states except for California they are in locations with lower annual-average PM SIGNIFICANCE: Strategies to improve access to low-cost sensors in less-privileged communities are needed to democratize air pollution data.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionDemographyEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticulate MatterUnited StatesAir PollutantsParticulate MatterEnvironmental justiceEPA monitorsLow-cost air quality sensorsPublic healthPurpleAir

Identifiers

PMID33958706
OpenAlexW3157758267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.