Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958700›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Brain size and neuron numbers drive differences in yawn duration across mammals and birds.

Jorg J M Massen, Margarita Hartlieb, Jordan S Martin, Elisabeth B Leitgeb, Jasmin Hockl, Martin Kocourek, Seweryn Olkowicz, Yicheng Zhang, Christin Osadnik, Jorrit W Verkleij and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. More than a simple fixed action pattern: Yawning in drills.Primates; journal of primatology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Interspecific Contagious Yawning in Humans.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  11. The evolution of brain neuron numbers in amniotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Jorg J M Massen *Animal Behaviour and Cognition, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. jorgmassen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-9606
Margarita Hartlieb *Department of Behavioral & Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jordan S Martin *Human Ecology Group, Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elisabeth B LeitgebDepartment of Behavioral & Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jasmin HocklDepartment of Behavioral & Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin KocourekDepartment of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Seweryn OlkowiczDepartment of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2370-4513
Yicheng ZhangDepartment of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-6304
Christin OsadnikDepartment of General Zoology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jorrit W VerkleijAnimal Behaviour and Cognition, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Thomas BugnyarDepartment of Behavioral & Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9667
Pavel NěmecDepartment of Zoology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0277-0239
Andrew C GallupPsychology Program, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Polytechnic Institute, Utica, NY, USA. a.c.gallup@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0512-5238
Charles University · CZUniversity of Vienna · ATUtrecht University · NLSUNY Polytechnic Institute · USUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that yawning evolved as a brain cooling mechanism. Given that larger brains have greater thermolytic needs and brain temperature is determined in part by heat production from neuronal activity, it was hypothesized that animals with larger brains and more neurons would yawn longer to produce comparable cooling effects. To test this, we performed the largest study on yawning ever conducted, analyzing 1291 yawns from 101 species (55 mammals; 46 birds). Phylogenetically controlled analyses revealed robust positive correlations between yawn duration and (1) brain mass, (2) total neuron number, and (3) cortical/pallial neuron number in both mammals and birds, which cannot be attributed solely to allometric scaling rules. These relationships were similar across clades, though mammals exhibited considerably longer yawns than birds of comparable brain and body mass. These findings provide further evidence suggesting that yawning is a thermoregulatory adaptation that has been conserved across amniote evolution.

Indexed as

YawningAnimalsBirdsBrainMammalsNeuronsOrgan Size

Identifiers

PMID33958700
PMCPMC8102614
OpenAlexW3159517714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.