Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958686›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Understanding inherent image features in CNN-based assessment of diabetic retinopathy.

Roc Reguant, Søren Brunak, Sajib Saha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Advanced CNN Deep Learning Model for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roc ReguantNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. roc.reguant@cpr.ku.dk.
Søren BrunakNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Sajib SahaAustralian E-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Perth, Australia.
Australian e-Health Research Centre · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUNovo Nordisk Foundation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness and affects millions of people throughout the world. Early detection and timely checkups are key to reduce the risk of blindness. Automated grading of DR is a cost-effective way to ensure early detection and timely checkups. Deep learning or more specifically convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods produce state-of-the-art performance in DR detection. Whilst CNN based methods have been proposed, no comparisons have been done between the extracted image features and their clinical relevance. Here we first adopt a CNN visualization strategy to discover the inherent image features involved in the CNN's decision-making process. Then, we critically analyze those features with respect to commonly known pathologies namely microaneurysms, hemorrhages and exudates, and other ocular components. We also critically analyze different CNNs by considering what image features they pick up during learning to predict and justify their clinical relevance. The experiments are executed on publicly available fundus datasets (EyePACS and DIARETDB1) achieving an accuracy of 89 ~ 95% with AUC, sensitivity and specificity of respectively 95 ~ 98%, 74 ~ 86%, and 93 ~ 97%, for disease level grading of DR. Whilst different CNNs produce consistent classification results, the rate of picked-up image features disagreement between models could be as high as 70%.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicDeep LearningDiabetic RetinopathyHumansSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID33958686
PMCPMC8102512
OpenAlexW3159219336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.