Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958664›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Deep learning methods allow fully automated segmentation of metacarpal bones to quantify volumetric bone mineral density.

Lukas Folle, Timo Meinderink, David Simon, Anna-Maria Liphardt, Gerhard Krönke, Georg Schett, Arnd Kleyer, Andreas Maier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning in rheumatological image interpretation.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas FollePattern Recognition Lab-Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. lukas.folle@fau.de.
Timo MeinderinkDepartment of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
David SimonDepartment of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Anna-Maria LiphardtDepartment of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Gerhard KrönkeDepartment of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Georg SchettDepartment of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Arnd KleyerDepartment of Internal Medicine 3-Rheumatology and Immunology, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Lab-Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthritis patients develop hand bone loss, which leads to destruction and functional impairment of the affected joints. High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) allows the quantification of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and bone microstructure in vivo with an isotropic voxel size of 82 micrometres. However, image-processing to obtain bone characteristics is a time-consuming process as it requires semi-automatic segmentation of the bone. In this work, a fully automatic vBMD measurement pipeline for the metacarpal (MC) bone using deep learning methods is introduced. Based on a dataset of HR-pQCT volumes with MC measurements for 541 patients with arthritis, a segmentation network is trained. The best network achieves an intersection over union as high as 0.94 and a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.97 while taking only 33 s to process a whole patient yielding a speedup between 2.5 and 4.0 for the whole workflow. Strong correlation between the vBMD measurements of the expert and of the automatic pipeline are achieved for the average bone density with 0.999 (Pearson) and 0.996 (Spearman's rank) with [Formula: see text] for all correlations. A qualitative assessment of the network predictions and the manual annotations yields a 65.9% probability that the expert favors the network predictions. Further, the steps to integrate the pipeline into the clinical workflow are shown. In order to make these workflow improvements available to others, we openly share the code of this work.

Indexed as

Bone DensityDeep LearningAutomationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMetacarpal BonesNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33958664
PMCPMC8102473
OpenAlexW3157938513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.