Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958491›Full record

Trial reportOpen heart2021

Patient delay and benefit of timely reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Karl Heinrich Scholz, Thomas Meyer, Björn Lengenfelder, Christian Vahlhaus, Jörn Tongers, Steffen Schnupp, Rainer Burckhard, Nicolas von Beckerath, Hans-Martin Grusnick, Andreas Jeron and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open heart, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00794001 (Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00794001 narecruitingnot on this map

Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FITT-STEMI): A Multicenter Trial Analyzing the Effects of Systematic Data Feedback on Treatment Quality and Survival Rates.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarl Heinrich ScholzRan2007 to 2026Enrolled50,000ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsData analysis and Feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Karl Heinrich ScholzDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care, St Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany.
Thomas MeyerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, and DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3509-1400
Björn LengenfelderDepartment of Cardiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christian VahlhausDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jörn TongersDepartment of Cardiology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Steffen SchnuppDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany.
Rainer BurckhardDepartment of Cardiology, Donauisar Klinikum Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany.
Nicolas von BeckerathDepartment of Cardiology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Viersen, Viersen, Germany.
Hans-Martin GrusnickDepartment of Cardiology, Sana Kliniken Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Andreas JeronDepartment of Cardiology, Rems-Murr-Kliniken, Winnenden, Germany.
Klaus Dieter WinterDepartment of Cardiology, Hermann-Josef-Hospital, Erkelenz, Germany.
Sebastian K G MaierDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Sankt Elisabeth Straubing, Straubing, Germany.
Michael DannerDepartment of Cardiology, Städtisches Klinikum, München Neuperlach, Munich, Germany.
Jürgen Vom DahlDepartment of Cardiology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Stefan NeefDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Stefan StefanowDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, and DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany tim.friede@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), it is unknown how patient delay modulates the beneficial effects of timely reperfusion.

aimsTo assess the prognostic significance of a contact-to-balloon time of less than 90 min on in-hospital mortality in different categories of symptom-onset-to-first-medical-contact (S2C) times.

methodsA total of 20 005 consecutive patients from the Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FITT-STEMI) programme treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included.

resultsThere were 1554 deaths (7.8%) with a J-shaped relationship between mortality and S2C time. Mortality was 10.0% in patients presenting within 1 hour, and 4.9%, 6.0% and 7.3% in patient groups with longer S2C intervals of 1-2 hours, 2-6 hours and 6-24 hours, respectively. Patients with a short S2C interval of less than 1 hour (S2C<60 min) had the highest survival benefit from timely reperfusion with PCI within 90 min (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.31, p<0.0001) as compared with the three groups with longer S2C intervals of 1 hour<S2C≤2 hours (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.59, p<0.0001), 2 hours<S2C≤6 hours (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64, p<0.0001) and 6 hours<S2C≤24 hours (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58, p<0.0001).

conclusionsTimely reperfusion with a contact-to-balloon time of less than 90 min is most effective in patients presenting with short S2C intervals of less than 1 hour, but has also beneficial effects in patients with S2C intervals of up to 24 hours. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00794001.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentAgedEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRisk FactorsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeacute coronary syndromechest painmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID33958491
PMCPMC8103948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.