Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33958337›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Practice of death surveillance and response for maternal, newborn and child health: a framework and application to a South African health district.

Fidele Kanyimbu Mukinda, Asha George, Sara Van Belle, Helen Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fidele Kanyimbu MukindaSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa fmukinda@uwc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-6213
Asha GeorgeSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sara Van BelleDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Helen SchneiderSchool of Public Health, South African Medical Research Council (MRC)/Health Services and Systems Unit, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the functioning of maternal, perinatal, neonatal and child death surveillance and response (DSR) mechanisms at a health district level.

designA framework of elements covering analysis of causes of death, and processes of review and response was developed and applied to the smallest unit of coordination (subdistrict) to evaluate DSR functioning. The evaluation design was a descriptive qualitative case study, based on observations of DSR practices and interviews.

settingRural South African health district (subdistricts and district office).

participantsA purposive sample of 45 front-line health managers and providers involved with maternal, perinatal, neonatal and child DSR. The DSR mechanisms reviewed included a system of real-time death reporting (24 hours) and review (48 hours), a nationally mandated confidential enquiry into maternal death and regular facility and subdistrict mortality audit and response processes. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Functioning of maternal, perinatal, neonatal and child DSR.

resultsWhile DSR mechanisms were integrated into the organisational routines of the district, their functioning varied across subdistricts and between forms of DSR. Some forms of DSR, notably those involving maternal deaths, with external reporting and accounting, were more likely to trigger reactive fault-finding and sanctioning than other forms, which were more proactive in supporting evidence-based actions to prevent future deaths. These actions occurred at provider and system level, and to a limited extent, in communities.

conclusionsThis study provides an empirical example of the everyday practice of DSR mechanisms at a district level. It assesses such practice based on a framework of elements and enabling organisational processes that may be of value in similar settings elsewhere.

Indexed as

Child HealthMaternal DeathChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal MortalityPregnancyQualitative ResearchRural Healthauditclinical audithealth services administration & managementpublic healthqualitative researchreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID33958337
PMCPMC8103944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.