ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021
The Fetus with Ganglionic Eminence Abnormality: Head Size and Extracranial Sonographic Findings Predict Genetic Diagnoses and Postnatal Outcomes.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- What you see is not always what you get-MRI-based ganglionic eminence volumetry challenges subjective assessment in CNS anomalies.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Value of Transvaginal Neurosonography in the Detection of Fetal Ganglionic Eminence Abnormalities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fetal magnetic resonance imaging features of syndromic megalencephaly: a systematic review of imaging-genotype associations.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Fetal malformations of cortical development: review and clinical guidance.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Posterior subependymal germinal matrix hemorrhage as a mild form of hemorrhage in extremely preterm infants: neurodevelopmental outcomes at corrected ages of 18-24 months.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Prenatal assessment of brain malformations on neuroimaging: an expert panel review.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Characteristic Fetal Brain MRI Abnormalities in Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Deficiency.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- TUBB3 and KIF21A in neurodevelopment and disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Prenatal MR Imaging Phenotype of Fetuses with Tuberous Sclerosis: An Institutional Case Series and Literature Review.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeGanglionic eminence abnormalities on fetal MR imaging are associated with cerebral malformations. Their presumed genetic basis and associated postnatal outcomes remain largely unknown. We aimed to elucidate these through a multicenter study. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween January 2010 and June 2020, seven hospitals in 2 countries performing fetal MR imaging examinations identified fetal MR imaging studies demonstrating ganglionic eminence enlargement, cavitation, or both. Cases with no genetic diagnosis, no whole exome sequencing, or no outcome of a liveborn child were excluded. Head size was classified as large (fronto-occipital diameter > 95th centile), small (fronto-occipital diameter <5th centile), or normal.
resultsTwenty-two fetuses with ganglionic eminence abnormalities were identified. Of 8 with large heads, 2 were diagnosed with
conclusionsFetal head size and extracranial prenatal sonographic findings can refine the phenotype and facilitate genetic diagnosis when ganglionic eminence abnormality is diagnosed with MR imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.