ReviewBiomarker research2021
Tumor reversion: a dream or a reality.
Review in Biomarker research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bidirectional network hubs: NT-genes as candidate targets for partial cancer reversal.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- miRNAs from Zebrafish Embryo Extracts Inhibit Breast Cancer Invasiveness and Migration by Modulating miR-218-5p/PI3K Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- KIAA1429 in non-small cell lung cancer: bridging m6A epigenetics to therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Association between CYP1A2 gene variants -163 C/A (rs762551) and -3860 G/A (rs2069514) and bladder cancer susceptibility.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- The phenotypic reversion of cancer: Experimental evidences on cancer reversibility through epigenetic mechanisms (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
- Reversing pathological cell states: the road less travelled can extend the therapeutic horizon.Trends in cell biology · 2023Review
- Is Cancer Reversible? Rethinking Carcinogenesis Models-A New Epistemological Tool.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Association of COVID-19 with Comorbidities: An Update.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023Review
- Antitumor Effect of Traditional Drugs for Neurological Disorders: Preliminary Studies in Neural Tumor Cell Lines.Neurotoxicity research · 2022Article
- The life cycle of polyploid giant cancer cells and dormancy in cancer: Opportunities for novel therapeutic interventions.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022Review
- The role of ncRNAs in neuroblastoma: mechanisms, biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Biomarker research · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reversion of tumor to a normal differentiated cell once considered a dream is now at the brink of becoming a reality. Different layers of molecules/events such as microRNAs, transcription factors, alternative RNA splicing, post-transcriptional, post-translational modifications, availability of proteomics, genomics editing tools, and chemical biology approaches gave hope to manipulation of cancer cells reversion to a normal cell phenotype as evidences are subtle but definitive. Regardless of the advancement, there is a long way to go, as customized techniques are required to be fine-tuned with precision to attain more insights into tumor reversion. Tumor regression models using available genome-editing methods, followed by in vitro and in vivo proteomics profiling techniques show early evidence. This review summarizes tumor reversion developments, present issues, and unaddressed challenges that remained in the uncharted territory to modulate cellular machinery for tumor reversion towards therapeutic purposes successfully. Ongoing research reaffirms the potential promises of understanding the mechanism of tumor reversion and required refinement that is warranted in vitro and in vivo models of tumor reversion, and the potential translation of these into cancer therapy. Furthermore, therapeutic compounds were reported to induce phenotypic changes in cancer cells into normal cells, which will contribute in understanding the mechanism of tumor reversion. Altogether, the efforts collectively suggest that tumor reversion will likely reveal a new wave of therapeutic discoveries that will significantly impact clinical practice in cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.