Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33957954›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Learning from public health and hospital resilience to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: protocol for a multiple case study (Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali).

Valéry Ridde, Lara Gautier, Christian Dagenais, Fanny Chabrol, Renyou Hou, Emmanuel Bonnet, Pierre-Marie David, Patrick Cloos, Arnaud Duhoux, Jean-Christophe Lucet and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Supporting Reassigned Hospital Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Montreal Region: What Does it say About Leadership Styles?The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Valéry RiddeCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France. valery.ridde@ird.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9299-8266
Lara GautierSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Christian DagenaisFaculté des arts et des sciences, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Fanny ChabrolCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.
Renyou HouCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.
Emmanuel BonnetUMR 215 Prodig, CNRS, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, AgroParisTech, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), Aubervilliers, France.
Pierre-Marie DavidFaculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Patrick CloosSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Arnaud DuhouxPole 1 de recherche sur la transformation des pratiques cliniques et organisationnelles, CISSS de Laval, Montréal, Canada.
Jean-Christophe LucetAP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France.
Lola TraversonCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.
Sydia Rosana de Araujo OliveiraInstitut Aggeu Magalhães, Oswaldo Cruz Fondacion, Recife, Brazil.
Gisele CazarinInstitut Aggeu Magalhães, Oswaldo Cruz Fondacion, Recife, Brazil.
Nathan Peiffer-SmadjaAP-HP, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France.
Laurence TouréMISELI, Bamako, Mali.
Abdourahmane CoulibalyMISELI, Bamako, Mali.
Ayako HondaResearch Center for Health Policy and Economics, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichiro NodaBureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toyomitsu TamuraBureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroko BabaBureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka KodoiCenter Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kate ZinszerSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPInserm · FRCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRMali-Folkecenter · MLUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité de Montréal · CAHitotsubashi University · JP

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-20-COVI-0001-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAll prevention efforts currently being implemented for COVID-19 are aimed at reducing the burden on strained health systems and human resources. There has been little research conducted to understand how SARS-CoV-2 has affected health care systems and professionals in terms of their work. Finding effective ways to share the knowledge and insight between countries, including lessons learned, is paramount to the international containment and management of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to compare the pandemic response to COVID-19 in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali. This comparison will be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in the response, including challenges for health professionals and health systems.

methodsWe will use a multiple case study approach with multiple levels of nested analysis. We have chosen these countries as they represent different continents and different stages of the pandemic. We will focus on several major hospitals and two public health interventions (contact tracing and testing). It will employ a multidisciplinary research approach that will use qualitative data through observations, document analysis, and interviews, as well as quantitative data based on disease surveillance data and other publicly available data. Given that the methodological approaches of the project will be largely qualitative, the ethical risks are minimal. For the quantitative component, the data being used will be made publicly available. DISCUSSION: We will deliver lessons learned based on a rigorous process and on strong evidence to enable operational-level insight for national and international stakeholders.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBrazilCanadaChinaFranceHospitalsHumansJapanMaliPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2COVID-19DesignEquityHospitalLessons learnedPublic healthResilience

Identifiers

PMID33957954
PMCPMC8100363
OpenAlexW3126349303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.