Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33957925›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2021

Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdulhakim Abamecha, Daniel Yilma, Wondimagegn Adissu, Delenasaw Yewhalaw, Alemseged Abdissa

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artemisinin resistantmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Recent Advances in Imported Malaria Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.Current emergency and hospital medicine reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Abdulhakim AbamechaSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. abdulhakimbamecha@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-4759
Daniel YilmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Wondimagegn AdissuSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Delenasaw YewhalawSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Alemseged AbdissaSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Jimma University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular monitoring of anti-malarial drug efficacy is vital for establishing rational malaria treatment guidelines and ensuring adequate treatment outcomes. This study aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the management of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ethiopia.

methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Relevant published studies were searched from the databases (PubMed, Google Scholar and Clinical trial registry) on published artemether-lumefantrine therapeutic efficacy studies conducted in Ethiopia from 2004 to 2020. The retrieved studies were assessed for quality using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies and modified Jadad scale for interventional studies. Risk of bias was also assessed by using ROBINS-I tool. OpenMeta-Analyst software was used for the statistical analysis. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO, number CRD42020201859.

resultsFifteen studies (1523 participants) were included in the final analysis. The overall PCR-uncorrected pooled proportion of treatment success of artemether-lumefantrine therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria was 98.4% (95%CI 97.6-99.1). A random-effects model was used because of considerable heterogeneity [χ

conclusionThe present meta-analysis suggests that artemether-lumefantrine therapy is efficacious and safe in treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ethiopia. However, owing to the high risk of bias in the included studies, strong conclusions cannot be drawn. Further high-quality RCTs assessing anti-malarial efficacy and safety should be performed to demonstrates strong evidence of changes in parasite sensitivity to artemether-lumefantrine in Ethiopia.

Indexed as

Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationEthiopiaHumansMalaria, FalciparumArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemether–lumefantrineEthiopiaPlasmodium falciparumSystematic reviewTherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID33957925
PMCPMC8101141
OpenAlexW3159206448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.