Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33957769›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2021

Telehealth Acceptability and Feasibility Among People Served in a Community Behavioral Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Jeanie Tse, Drew LaStella, Elisa Chow, Emily Kingman, Shoshannah Pearlman, Linda Valeri, Hao Wang, Lisa B Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Digital psychiatry in Nigeria: A scoping review.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Neuroethics in the Era of Teleneurology.Seminars in neurology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Virtual Behavioral Health Treatment Satisfaction and Outcomes Across Time.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeanie TseInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Drew LaStellaInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Elisa ChowInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Emily KingmanInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Shoshannah PearlmanInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Linda ValeriInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Hao WangInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Lisa B DixonInstitute for Community Living, New York City (Tse, LaStella, Chow, Kingman, Pearlman, Wang); New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Tse); New York University Silver School of Social Work, New York City (Chow); Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City (Valeri); New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Dixon); Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City (Dixon). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., served as decision editor on the manuscript.

Funding

Using mHealth to optimize pharmacotherapy regimensP50MH115843 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Neil Krishan Aggarwal · 2018 to 2026
$12.7M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe authors examined the acceptability and feasibility of telehealth services shortly after their rapid introduction into a community behavioral health agency as part of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsIndividuals receiving services during May 8-18, 2020, from behavioral health programs that had introduced telehealth in March 2020, were invited to participate in a survey regarding their perceptions of the telehealth services. Ordinal logistic regressions were used to test for differences in survey responses in three ways: between program types, between the 2020 sample and a 2018 sample, and between individuals reported by staff to be distressed or not distressed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsOf 1,482 survey respondents, >80% reported that their ability to connect to staff, receive support, and get an appointment was at least as great as before the pandemic. Among 80% of respondents indicating interest in continuing remote services after the pandemic ended, 83% preferred a mix of remote and face-to-face services. From February 2020 to April 2020, total service utilization remained stable for treatment, outreach, and housing programs. In addition, mental health-related hospital utilization did not increase.

conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that telehealth, including telephone-based services, is an acceptable and even preferred service delivery mode for clients with severe mental illness. Continued investigation into the optimal dosing of face-to-face versus remote services in various settings is needed to inform service practice during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesCOVID-19PandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychiatryTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesHumansMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Community mental health servicesRemote servicesTelecommunicationsTelehealthTelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID33957769
PMCPMC11184975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.