Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33957227›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2021

Anatomic eligibility for endovascular aneurysm repair preserved over 2 years of surveillance.

Annalise M Panthofer, Sydney L Olson, Brooks L Rademacher, Jennifer K Grudzinski, Elliot L Chaikof, Jon S Matsumura, N-TA(3)CT Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05607277 (Global Iliac Branch Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05607277 completednot on this map

Global Iliac Branch Study (Iliac Conformability Paper, Gore vs. Cook)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2014 to 2021Enrolled297ConditionsAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Iliac AneurysmArmsEndovascular Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annalise M PanthoferSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc. Electronic address: panthofer@surgery.wisc.edu.
Sydney L OlsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc.
Brooks L RademacherSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc.
Jennifer K GrudzinskiSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc.
Elliot L ChaikofDepartment of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass.
Jon S MatsumuraSchool of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc.
N-TA(3)CT Investigators
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Non-Invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA^3CT )R01AG037120 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BAXTER, BERNARD TIMOTHY, CURCI, JOHN A · 2011 to 2017
$12.2M
Doxycycline Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: PlanningR34AG028684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI TERRIN, MICHAEL L. · 2007 to 2007
$101k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037120NIA NIH HHS R34 AG028684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a widely used option for patients with suitable vascular anatomy who have a large infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Patients with small AAAs are managed with careful surveillance and it is a common concern that their anatomy may change with AAA growth, and their option for EVAR may become limited. Device innovation has resulted in expanded ranges of anatomy that may be eligible for EVAR. This study sought to identify changes in anatomic eligibility for repair with contemporary endovascular devices in AAA patients, monitored by computed tomography scan over the course of 2 years.

methodsPatients from the Non-Invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA

resultsWe included 192 patients in this analysis-168 male and 24 female. Of these patients, 85% were eligible for EVAR at baseline and 85% after 2 years of follow-up (P = 1.00; 95% confidence interval -0.034 to 0.034). Of the 164 EVAR candidates at baseline, 160 (98%) remained eligible over 2 years of surveillance. Insufficient neck length was the most common reason for both ineligibility at baseline (18 of 28 patients) as well as loss of candidacy over 2 years (3 of 4 patients).

conclusionsThe majority of patients eligible for EVAR when entering a surveillance program for small AAA remain eligible after 2 years. Substantial changes in AAA neck anatomy resulting in loss of EVAR treatment options are infrequent. Patients with anatomic AAA progression beyond EVAR eligibility remain candidates for complex EVAR and open repair.

Indexed as

AortographyBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationComputed Tomography AngiographyEligibility DeterminationEndovascular ProceduresAgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel ProsthesisClinical Decision-MakingDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsAbdominalAortic aneurysmDecision-makingEndovascular proceduresShared

Identifiers

PMID33957227
PMCPMC8545745
OpenAlexW3157115085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.