Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33957159›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2021

Disjoint subspaces for common and distinct component analysis: Application to the fusion of multi-task FMRI data.

M A B S Akhonda, Ben Gabrielson, Suchita Bhinge, Vince D Calhoun, Tülay Adali

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M A B S AkhondaDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, 21250 MD, USA. Electronic address: mo32@umbc.edu.
Ben GabrielsonDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, 21250 MD, USA.
Suchita BhingeDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, 21250 MD, USA.
Vince D CalhounTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science, Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, Atlanta, 30303 GA, USA.
Tülay AdaliDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, 21250 MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore County · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Male/Female differences in psychosis and mood disorders:Dynamic imaging-genomic models for characterizing and predicting psychosis and mood dR01MH118695 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Data driven dynamic activity/connectivity methods for early detection of Alzheimer’sR01AG073949 · NIA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Data-driven solutions for temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal dynamic functional connectivityR01MH123610 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073949NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118695NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData-driven methods such as independent component analysis (ICA) makes very few assumptions on the data and the relationships of multiple datasets, and hence, are attractive for the fusion of medical imaging data. Two important extensions of ICA for multiset fusion are the joint ICA (jICA) and the multiset canonical correlation analysis and joint ICA (MCCA-jICA) techniques. Both approaches assume identical mixing matrices, emphasizing components that are common across the multiple datasets. However, in general, one would expect to have components that are both common across the datasets and distinct to each dataset. NEW

methodWe propose a general framework, disjoint subspace analysis using ICA (DS-ICA), which identifies and extracts not only the common but also the distinct components across multiple datasets. A key component of the method is the identification of these subspaces and their separation before subsequent analyses, which helps establish better model match and provides flexibility in algorithm and order choice. COMPARISON: We compare DS-ICA with jICA and MCCA-jICA through both simulations and application to multiset functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task data collected from healthy controls as well as patients with schizophrenia.

resultsThe results show DS-ICA estimates more components discriminative between healthy controls and patients than jICA and MCCA-jICA, and with higher discriminatory power showing activation differences in meaningful regions. When applied to a classification framework, components estimated by DS-ICA results in higher classification performance for different dataset combinations than the other two methods.

conclusionThese results demonstrate that DS-ICA is an effective method for fusion of multiple datasets.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSchizophreniaAlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingHumansMultivariate AnalysisCommon and distinct componentsData fusionFMRIICAIVA

Identifiers

PMID33957159
PMCPMC8217295
OpenAlexW3159683664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.