Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33957152›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2021

Which tobacco control policies do smokers support? Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Tracy T Smith, Georges J Nahhas, Ron Borland, Yoo Jin Cho, Janet Chung-Hall, Robert T Fairman, Geoffrey T Fong, Ann McNeill, Lucy Popova, James F Thrasher and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect on Tobacco Use and Subjective Measures of Including E-cigarettes in a Simulated Ban of Menthol in Combustible Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perceptions of Nicotine Reduction Policy in the United States: A Qualitative Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tracy T SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC 29425, United States. Electronic address: smithtra@musc.edu.
Georges J NahhasDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Ron BorlandSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Yoo Jin ChoDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, United States.
Janet Chung-HallDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Robert T FairmanSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, United States.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada; School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Ann McNeillAddictions Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy PopovaSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302, United States.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, United States.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI John J Lemasters · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL, FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
Communicating about nicotine tobacco product standard in cigar productsR01CA239308 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Lyudmila Popova · 2019 to 2026
$3.8M
Impact of e-cigarette characteristics on reinforcement and tobacco use patterns among current smokersK01DA047433 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SMITH, TRACY TAYLOR · 2019 to 2023
$988k
CIHR FDN-148477NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239308NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA047433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As governments consider policy action to reduce smoking, a key factor in creating political will is the level of public support, particularly among smokers who are most affected by the policies. The goal of this paper is to assess and compare the level of support in Canada, the United States, England, and Australia for five smoking control policies: 1) banning menthol in cigarettes, 2) banning cigarette additives, 3) reducing nicotine in cigarettes to make them less addictive, 4) raising the minimum age to purchase cigarettes to 21 years and older, and 5) requiring pictorial warning labels on cigarette packs (examined in the US only). Data for these analyses come from 8165 daily cigarette smokers who responded to the 2016 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. In all countries, the highest level of support was for raising the legal age for purchase to 21 years and older (62-70%) and reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes to make them less addictive (57-70%). Smokers who were less dependent on cigarettes and those expressing interest in quitting were more likely to support all policies. When asked how they would respond to a nicotine reduction policy, the most common response given was to try the non-nicotine cigarettes to see how they liked them (42-48%), with the next most common response being to quit smoking entirely (16-24%). The high level of support for these proposed policies among daily smokers provides important evidence for policymakers to counteract claims that such policies would be unpopular.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAustraliaCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandHumansPublic PolicySmokersSmokingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33957152
PMCPMC8580201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.