Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33957119›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry

50 Years of structural immunology.

Ian A Wilson, Robyn L Stanfield

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The smallest functional antibody fragment: Ultralong CDR H3 antibody knob regions potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian A WilsonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA; The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA. Electronic address: wilson@scripps.edu.
Robyn L StanfieldDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Structural studies of native-like SOSIP trimersP01AI110657 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MOORE, JOHN P · 2015 to 2024
$35.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI110657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifty years ago, the first landmark structures of antibodies heralded the dawn of structural immunology. Momentum then started to build toward understanding how antibodies could recognize the vast universe of potential antigens and how antibody-combining sites could be tailored to engage antigens with high specificity and affinity through recombination of germline genes (V, D, J) and somatic mutation. Equivalent groundbreaking structures in the cellular immune system appeared some 15 to 20 years later and illustrated how processed protein antigens in the form of peptides are presented by MHC molecules to T cell receptors. Structures of antigen receptors in the innate immune system then explained their inherent specificity for particular microbial antigens including lipids, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, small molecules, and specific proteins. These two sides of the immune system act immediately (innate) to particular microbial antigens or evolve (adaptive) to attain high specificity and affinity to a much wider range of antigens. We also include examples of other key receptors in the immune system (cytokine receptors) that regulate immunity and inflammation. Furthermore, these antigen receptors use a limited set of protein folds to accomplish their various immunological roles. The other main players are the antigens themselves. We focus on surface glycoproteins in enveloped viruses including SARS-CoV-2 that enable entry and egress into host cells and are targets for the antibody response. This review covers what we have learned over the past half century about the structural basis of the immune response to microbial pathogens and how that information can be utilized to design vaccines and therapeutics.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityImmunity, InnateAllergy and ImmunologyAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntibody SpecificityAntigen PresentationAntigens, ViralCOVID-19CrystallographyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansProtein FoldingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Cytokineantibodiescellular immunityhumoral immunityimmune recognitionMHCmicrobial pathogensT cellsTLRviral antigensVLR

Identifiers

PMID33957119
PMCPMC8163984
OpenAlexW3157232830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.