ArticleAsian spine journal2022
Diabetes Mellitus and the Development of Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Is There Any Relevance?
Article in Asian spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective study. PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between the severity of lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) and type-II diabetes mellitus (DM). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: DM is a multiorgan disorder that has an effect on all types of connective tissues. LCS is a narrowing of the spinal canal with nerve root impingement that causes neurological claudication and radiculopathy. Identification of the risk factors of LCS is key in the prevention of its onset or progression.
methodsLCS patients were divided into three groups as per DM status: group A without DM (n=150); group B patients with well-controlled DM; and group C patients with uncontrolled DM. Groups B and C were subdivided into group B1: patients with DM with a duration of ≤10 years (n=76), group B2: DM with duration of >10 years (n=68), group-C1 DM duration ≤10 years (n=56), and group C2 DM duration >10 years (n=48). The severity of LCS was evaluated using the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Scale (SSSS) and Modified Oswestry Disability score (MODS). Operated patients ligamentum flavum sent for histological staining and quantitative immunofluorescence analysis.
resultsThe demographic data of groups did not show any difference except in age. There was no difference between the mean SSSS and MODS of groups A and B1. Groups B2, C1, and C2 had higher average SSSS and MODS than group A (p<0.05). Groups B2 and C2 had higher SSSS and MODS than groups B1 and C1. Groups C1 and C2 had higher scores than groups B1 and B2 (p<0.05). The severity of LCS was significantly related to the duration of DM in groups B and C (p<0.05). Uncontrolled and longer duration of DM had significant elastin fibers loss and also higher rate of disk apoptosis, high matrix aggrecan fragmentation, and high disk glycosaminoglycan content.
conclusionsLonger duration and uncontrolled diabetes were risk factors for LCS and directly correlate with the severity of LCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.