Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33956861›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Advancing health equity in cancer care: The lived experiences of poverty and access to lung cancer screening.

Ambreen Sayani, Mandana Vahabi, Mary Ann O'Brien, Geoffrey Liu, Stephen Hwang, Peter Selby, Erika Nicholson, Meredith Giuliani, Lawson Eng, Aisha Lofters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ambreen SayaniWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-7769
Mandana VahabiDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mary Ann O'BrienWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Geoffrey LiuDalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen HwangMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1276-1101
Peter SelbyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erika NicholsonCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Meredith GiulianiPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lawson EngPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aisha LoftersWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7322-0894

Funding

CIHR 705592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals living with low income are more likely to smoke, have a higher risk of lung cancer, and are less likely to participate in preventative healthcare (i.e., low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening), leading to equity concerns. To inform the delivery of an organized pilot lung cancer screening program in Ontario, we sought to contextualize the lived experiences of poverty and the choice to participate in lung cancer screening.

methodsAt three Toronto academic primary-care clinics, high-risk screen-eligible patients who chose or declined LDCT screening were consented; sociodemographic data was collected. Qualitative interviews were conducted. Theoretical thematic analysis was used to organize, describe and interpret the data using the morphogenetic approach as a guiding theoretical lens.

resultsEight participants chose to undergo screening; ten did not. From interviews, we identified three themes: Pathways of disadvantage (social trajectories of events that influence lung-cancer risk and health-seeking behaviour), lung-cancer risk and early detection (upstream factors that shape smoking behaviour and lung-cancer screening choices), and safe spaces of care (care that is free of bias, conflict, criticism, or potentially threatening actions, ideas or conversations). We illuminate how 'choice' is contextual to the availability of material resources such as income and housing, and how 'choice' is influenced by having access to spaces of care that are free of judgement and personal bias.

conclusionUnderserved populations will require multiprong interventions that work at the individual, system and structural level to reduce inequities in lung-cancer risk and access to healthcare services such as cancer screening.

Indexed as

Health EquityPovertyAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CareRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33956861
PMCPMC8101716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.