Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33956847›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Virtual triage and outcomes of diabetic foot complications during Covid-19 pandemic: A retro-prospective, observational cohort study.

Ashu Rastogi, Priya Hiteshi, Anil Bhansali A, Edward B Jude

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diabetic foot disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned for our future.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2022
    Article
  11. The far side of the pandemic: Has diabetic foot osteomyelitis been neglected due to COVID-19?The International journal of health planning and management · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashu RastogiDepartment of Endocrinology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9375-3102
Priya HiteshiDepartment of Endocrinology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Anil Bhansali ADepartment of Endocrinology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Edward B JudeTameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Tameside on Lyne, United Kingdom and Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INManchester Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLimb and patient outcomes in people with diabetic foot complications including diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) provided virtual triage and personalized video consultations during COVID-19 pandemic are not known.

methodsPatients with foot complications attending the diabetic foot clinic prior to lockdown who sought teleconsultations during COVID-19 lockdown underwent virtual triage to include clinical history, visual inspection of feet, domiciliary wound care (community nurse assisted dressings) and offloading instructions. The subsequent ulcer, limb and mortality outcomes during the following 24 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown (April-September 2020, group 1) were assessed and compared with those who attended foot clinic during the same period in 2019 (April-September, group 2).

resultsGroup 1 included 561 participants with foot complications provided with teleconsultations, median age 57 (51 to 63) years and diabetes duration of 10 (5 to 16) years. Twelve patients with severe DFU were excluded and 549 patients [357 (65%) neuropathic foot, 104 (18.9%) ischemic foot and 88 (16%) chronic Charcot foot with deformities] were evaluated. There were 227 (41.3%) participants with active DFU at start of lockdown, 32 (5.8%) with new onset ulcer during lockdown (47.1%) and 290 patients without ulcers. Group 2 included 650 participants; active foot ulcer was present in 366 patients. Wound closed or reduced in area in 78.4% of participants of group 1 compared to 76.0% (p = 0.318) in group 2. Fourteen (5.4%) patients required amputations [3 major and 11 minor] in group 1 during the study period compared to 6.8% in group 2 (p = 0.191). Twenty-one (3.8%) and 28 (4.3%) patients died (p = 0.532) during 24 weeks of follow up in group 1 and 2, respectively.

conclusionsTargeted foot-care service through virtual triage and teleconsultations during COVID-19 pandemic for people with foot complications have similar ulcer and limb outcomes compared to face-to-face foot care delivery.

Indexed as

TelemedicineCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTriage

Identifiers

PMID33956847
PMCPMC8101747
OpenAlexW3159538648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.