Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33956557›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Experience and attitudes on vaccinations recommended during pregnancy: survey on an Italian sample of women and consultant gynecologists.

Maria Scatigna, Alessandro Appetiti, Mariachiara Pasanisi, Silvia D'Eugenio, Leila Fabiani, Anna Rita Giuliani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria ScatignaDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-072X
Alessandro AppetitiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Mariachiara PasanisiDepartment of Prevention, Local Health Authority No. 1 (ASL 1), Abruzzo, Italy.
Silvia D'EugenioDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Leila FabianiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-1450
Anna Rita GiulianiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
University of L'Aquila · ITLocal Government Association · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active immunization in pregnancy is recommended for the influenza and the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. Evidence indicates vaccine effectiveness in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations and pertussis in early infancy. We investigate vaccine uptake in pregnant and non-pregnant women through a sample of young women and consultant gynecologists, along with the potential predisposing and/or enabling factors affecting attitudes to vaccination (knowledge, beliefs, barriers). A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and September 2019, with a sample of 251 women and 14 consultant gynecologists at the Local Health Authority (ASL01) of the Abruzzo Region (Italy), using an anonymous, self-report questionnaire survey. Among the participants, 5.6% of women had received influenza vaccination, 16.4% had received Tdap during pregnancy and only 1.2% had received both vaccines. The assessment of the psychometric attitudinal variables has suggested a more positive willingness to receive Tdap than influenza vaccine among women, as the former is considered more important for the maternal and neonatal health. Health care workers have reported vaccine safety concerns, lack of information, and misconceptions about the need for vaccination as barriers to immunization in pregnant women. The results of this study will contribute to defining the goals and strategies to increase vaccine uptake under the current recommendations, through promoting effective training programs for all health care workers involved (gynecologists, obstetricians, public health physicians).

Indexed as

DiphtheriaDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesTetanusWhooping CoughAttitudeConsultantsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePertussis VaccinePregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesPertussis Vaccineattitudesinfluenza vaccinepregnancyTdapVaccinations

Identifiers

PMID33956557
PMCPMC8920149
OpenAlexW3158703581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.