Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33956307›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Domain adaptation and self-supervised learning for surgical margin detection.

Alice M L Santilli, Amoon Jamzad, Alireza Sedghi, Martin Kaufmann, Kathryn Logan, Julie Wallis, Kevin Y M Ren, Natasja Janssen, Shaila Merchant, Jay Engel and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Anomaly detection using intraoperative iKnife data: a comparative analysis in breast cancer surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alice M L SantilliSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada. 14amls@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-1727
Amoon JamzadSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Alireza SedghiSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Martin KaufmannDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Kathryn LoganDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Julie WallisDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin Y M RenDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Natasja JanssenSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Shaila MerchantDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Jay EngelDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Doug McKayDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Sonal VarmaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Ami WangDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Gabor FichtingerSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
John F RudanDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Parvin MousaviSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne in five women who undergo breast conserving surgery will need a second revision surgery due to remaining tumor. The iKnife is a mass spectrometry modality that produces real-time margin information based on the metabolite signatures in surgical smoke. Using this modality and real-time tissue classification, surgeons could remove all cancerous tissue during the initial surgery, improving many facets of patient outcomes. An obstacle in developing a iKnife breast cancer recognition model is the destructive, time-consuming and sensitive nature of the data collection that limits the size of the datasets.

methodsWe address these challenges by first, building a self-supervised learning model from limited, weakly labeled data. By doing so, the model can learn to contextualize the general features of iKnife data from a more accessible cancer type. Second, the trained model can then be applied to a cancer classification task on breast data. This domain adaptation allows for the transfer of learnt weights from models of one tissue type to another.

resultsOur datasets contained 320 skin burns (129 tumor burns, 191 normal burns) from 51 patients and 144 breast tissue burns (41 tumor and 103 normal) from 11 patients. We investigate the effect of different hyper-parameters on the performance of the final classifier. The proposed two-step method performed statistically significantly better than a baseline model (p-value < 0.0001), by achieving an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 92%, 88% and 92%, respectively.

conclusionThis is the first application of domain transfer for iKnife REIMS data. We showed that having a limited number of breast data samples for training a classifier can be compensated by self-supervised learning and domain adaption on a set of unlabeled skin data. We plan to confirm this performance by collecting new breast samples and extending it to incorporate other cancer tissues.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsArea Under CurveBasal Cell CarcinomaBreastBreast NeoplasmsCalibrationFemaleHumansMachine LearningMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalOperating RoomsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBasal cell carcinomaBreast cancerClassificationIKnifeMass spectrometrySelf-supervised learningTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID33956307
OpenAlexW3159603107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.