Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33956291›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2021

Effects of Itraconazole and Micafungin on Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilms.

Musang Liu, Hailin Zheng, Rong Zeng, Guanzhao Liang, Nan Zheng, Weida Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Musang LiuInstitute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, 12 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, Jiangsu, China.
Hailin ZhengInstitute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, 12 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, Jiangsu, China.
Rong ZengInstitute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, 12 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, Jiangsu, China.
Guanzhao LiangInstitute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, 12 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, Jiangsu, China.
Nan ZhengMedical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Weida LiuInstitute of Dermatology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, 12 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, Jiangsu, China. liumyco@hotmail.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Dermatology Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2019XK32007National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2019ZX09721001-006-003National Natural Science Foundation of China 81501726National Natural Science Foundation of China 81502739Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20150069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus) is the most common airborne opportunistic fungal pathogen. Biofilm formation is one of the main pathogenic mechanisms of A. fumigatus. During the past decades, A. fumigatus azole resistance has become prevalent due to the medical and agricultural use of antifungal drugs and fungicides. Until now, the role of fungal biofilms in azole resistance of A. fumigatus remains unclear. In the present study, we compared biofilm drug susceptibility and biofilm formation under itraconazole of azole-resistant strains, sensitive strains, and standard strains, separately. The biofilm viability and matrix thickness at the early and the late stage were measured by XTT assay and Calcofluor white. Our results showed that the sessile minimum inhibitory concentration of itraconazole, which describing the inhibition of drugs on fungi sessile with biofilm, was much higher than the traditional minimal inhibitory concentration of itraconazole. Additionally, low concentrations of itraconazole inhibited biofilm formation of A. fumigatus strains. Notably, biofilm formation by azole-resistant strains could not be inhibited by high concentrations of itraconazole but could be effectively restrained by low concentrations of micafungin, revealing the efficacy of a cell-wall inhibitor to disrupt A. fumigatus biofilm formation. However, late-stage biofilms of both azole-resistant strains and standard strains were hard to disrupt using itraconazole. We found that itraconazole was effective to prevent A. fumigatus biofilm formation at the early stage. For the treatment of A. fumigatus biofilm, our findings suggest that an early-stage preventive strategy is preferred and micafungin is effective to control the azole-resistant strain infection.

Indexed as

Aspergillus fumigatusAntifungal AgentsAzolesBiofilmsDrug Resistance, FungalFungal ProteinsItraconazoleMicafunginMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsAzolesFungal ProteinsItraconazoleMicafunginAspergillus fumigatusAzoleAzole-resistantBiofilmsFungiItraconazoleMicafungin

Identifiers

PMID33956291
OpenAlexW3157685423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.