ArticleMycopathologia2021
Effects of Itraconazole and Micafungin on Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilms.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Landscapes of Azole Resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilm Exposed to Voriconazole.Mycopathologia · 2025Article
- In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of Luliconazole (NND-502) against Planktonic Cells and Biofilms of Azole ResistantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Understanding the environmental drivers of clinical azole resistance inDrug target insightsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus) is the most common airborne opportunistic fungal pathogen. Biofilm formation is one of the main pathogenic mechanisms of A. fumigatus. During the past decades, A. fumigatus azole resistance has become prevalent due to the medical and agricultural use of antifungal drugs and fungicides. Until now, the role of fungal biofilms in azole resistance of A. fumigatus remains unclear. In the present study, we compared biofilm drug susceptibility and biofilm formation under itraconazole of azole-resistant strains, sensitive strains, and standard strains, separately. The biofilm viability and matrix thickness at the early and the late stage were measured by XTT assay and Calcofluor white. Our results showed that the sessile minimum inhibitory concentration of itraconazole, which describing the inhibition of drugs on fungi sessile with biofilm, was much higher than the traditional minimal inhibitory concentration of itraconazole. Additionally, low concentrations of itraconazole inhibited biofilm formation of A. fumigatus strains. Notably, biofilm formation by azole-resistant strains could not be inhibited by high concentrations of itraconazole but could be effectively restrained by low concentrations of micafungin, revealing the efficacy of a cell-wall inhibitor to disrupt A. fumigatus biofilm formation. However, late-stage biofilms of both azole-resistant strains and standard strains were hard to disrupt using itraconazole. We found that itraconazole was effective to prevent A. fumigatus biofilm formation at the early stage. For the treatment of A. fumigatus biofilm, our findings suggest that an early-stage preventive strategy is preferred and micafungin is effective to control the azole-resistant strain infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.