Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33956208›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Sound localization with bilateral bone conduction devices.

Coosje J I Caspers, A M Janssen, M J H Agterberg, C W R J Cremers, M K S Hol, A J Bosman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the effectiveness of bone conduction hearing implants in rehabilitation of hearing loss.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Coosje J I CaspersDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. coosje.caspers@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5287-6878
A M JanssenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5337-2962
M J H AgterbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C W R J CremersDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M K S HolDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-935X
A J BosmanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-989X
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate sound localization in patients bilaterally fitted with bone conduction devices (BCDs). Additionally, clinically applicable methods to improve localization accuracy were explored.

methodsFifteen adults with bilaterally fitted percutaneous BCDs were included. At baseline, sound localization, (un)aided pure-tone thresholds, device use, speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) and York hearing-related quality of life (YHRQL) questionnaire were measured. Settings to optimize sound localizing were added to the BCDs. At 1 month, sound localization was assessed again and localization was practiced with a series of sounds with visual feedback. At 3 months¸ localization performance, device use and questionnaire scores were determined again.

resultsAt baseline, one patient with congenital hearing loss demonstrated near excellent localization performance and four other patients (three with congenital hearing loss) localized sounds (quite) accurately. Seven patients with acquired hearing loss were able to lateralize sounds, i.e. identify whether sounds were coming from the left or right side, but could not localize sounds accurately. Three patients (one with congenital hearing loss) could not even lateralize sounds correctly. SSQ scores were significantly higher at 3 months. Localization performance, device use and YHRQL scores were not significantly different between visits.

conclusionIn this study, the majority of experienced bilateral BCD users could lateralize sounds and one third was able to localize sounds (quite) accurately. The localization performance was robust and stable over time. Although SSQ scores were increased at the last visit, optimizing device settings and a short practice session did not improve sound localization.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionAdultBone ConductionHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansQuality of LifeBAHABCDBilateralBinaural hearingConductive hearing lossDevice useHearing-related quality of lifeSound localization

Identifiers

PMID33956208
PMCPMC8930961
OpenAlexW3157537396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.