Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33955842›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Meal-time Smartphone Use in an Obesogenic Environment: Two Longitudinal Observational Studies.

Joceline Y Y Yong, Eddie M W Tong, Jean C J Liu

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03299075 unknown statusnot on this map

The Effect of Social Media Use on Eating Behaviours

TypeobservationalSponsorYale-NUS CollegeRan2017 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsEating Behavior
NCT03346785 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effect of Social Media Use on Eating Behaviours

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale-NUS CollegeRan2017 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsFood Photography, Non-Food Photography, No Phone UseArmsFood Photography, Non-Food Photography, No Phone Use
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Media Parenting Practices and Early Adolescent Cyberbullying: Findings From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joceline Y Y YongDivision of Social Sciences, Yale-National University of Singapore College, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0926-8516
Eddie M W TongDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8724-650X
Jean C J LiuDivision of Social Sciences, Yale-National University of Singapore College, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-3450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a large volume of research on the impact of other digital screens (eg, televisions) on eating behavior, little is known about the nature and impact of mealtime smartphone use.

objectiveWe investigated how smartphones are used in everyday meals, whether phone users differ according to mealtime phone use patterns, and whether specific phone functions (particularly food photography) would affect the amount and enjoyment of food eaten.

methodsAcross 2 studies, we used the experience sampling method to track 1780 meals in situ. In study 1, a total 137 young adults reported on their mealtime smartphone use 3 times per day over 7 consecutive days. This corresponded to each main meal, with participants recording whether they used their phones and what phone functions they engaged in while eating. In study 2, a total of 71 young adults were similarly tracked for 3 meals per day over 7 days. Across the week, participants' meals were randomized to 1 of 3 smartphone conditions: food photography while eating, nonfood photography while eating, or no phone use. As the outcome measures, participants reported on the amount and enjoyment of food they ate.

resultsDuring the week-long tracking, most participants (110/129, 85.3%) recorded at least one instance of mealtime smartphone use, with an average frequency of 1 in 3 meals where phones were used (27.1%; 95% CI 23.6-30.6). Unlike traditional digital screens, mealtime phone use encompassed a wide range of social and nonsocial activities. Further, specific forms of phone use behaviors influenced food intake in different ways. Specifically, in study 2, participants showed the typical pattern of increased food intake across the day when they engaged in nonfood photography during a meal (P<.001); however, this pattern was disrupted when they engaged in food photography (P=.73).

conclusionsOur findings underscore the prevalence and multifaceted nature of mealtime phone use, distinguishing mobile phones from traditional forms of digital screens.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03299075; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03299075 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346785; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03346785.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneSmartphoneEmotionsFeeding BehaviorHumansMealsYoung Adultmobile phonesobesogenic environmentscreen timetechnologyyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID33955842
PMCPMC8138713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.