Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33955834›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Use of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict the Understandability of Health Education Materials: Development and Evaluation Study.

Meng Ji, Yanmeng Liu, Mengdan Zhao, Ziqing Lyu, Boren Zhang, Xin Luo, Yanlin Li, Yin Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Meng JiSchool of Languages and Cultures, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7463-9208
Yanmeng LiuSchool of Languages and Cultures, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6444-8504
Mengdan ZhaoSchool of Languages and Cultures, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9321-9391
Ziqing LyuSchool of Languages and Cultures, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2831-3987
Boren ZhangSchool of Languages and Cultures, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-0066
Xin LuoDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2592-204X
Yanlin LiDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-1093
Yin ZhongDepartment of English, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-3324
The University of Sydney · AUHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving the understandability of health information can significantly increase the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of health education programs for vulnerable populations. There is a pressing need to develop clinically informed computerized tools to enable rapid, reliable assessment of the linguistic understandability of specialized health and medical education resources. This paper fills a critical gap in current patient-oriented health resource development, which requires reliable and accurate evaluation instruments to increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of health education resource evaluation.

objectiveWe aimed to translate internationally endorsed clinical guidelines to machine learning algorithms to facilitate the evaluation of the understandability of health resources for international students at Australian universities.

methodsBased on international patient health resource assessment guidelines, we developed machine learning algorithms to predict the linguistic understandability of health texts for Australian college students (aged 25-30 years) from non-English speaking backgrounds. We compared extreme gradient boosting, random forest, neural networks, and C5.0 decision tree for automated health information understandability evaluation. The 5 machine learning models achieved statistically better results compared to the baseline logistic regression model. We also evaluated the impact of each linguistic feature on the performance of each of the 5 models.

resultsWe found that information evidentness, relevance to educational purposes, and logical sequence were consistently more important than numeracy skills and medical knowledge when assessing the linguistic understandability of health education resources for international tertiary students with adequate English skills (International English Language Testing System mean score 6.5) and high health literacy (mean 16.5 in the Short Assessment of Health Literacy-English test). Our results challenge the traditional views that lack of medical knowledge and numerical skills constituted the barriers to the understanding of health educational materials.

conclusionsMachine learning algorithms were developed to predict health information understandability for international college students aged 25-30 years. Thirteen natural language features and 5 evaluation dimensions were identified and compared in terms of their impact on the performance of the models. Health information understandability varies according to the demographic profiles of the target readers, and for international tertiary students, improving health information evidentness, relevance, and logic is critical.

Indexed as

health educationmachine learningpatient-orientedPEMATunderstandability evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33955834
PMCPMC8138706
OpenAlexW3151861317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.