Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33955705›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2021

An artificial neural network-pharmacokinetic model and its interpretation using Shapley additive explanations.

Chika Ogami, Yasuhiro Tsuji, Hiroto Seki, Hideaki Kawano, Hideto To, Yoshiaki Matsumoto, Hiroyuki Hosono

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational approaches for toxicology and Pharmacokinetic properties prediction.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Training the next generation of pharmacometric modelers: a multisector perspective.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. An artificial intelligence-assisted physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to predict nanoparticle delivery to tumors in mice.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chika OgamiDepartment of Medical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Yasuhiro TsujiCenter for Pharmacist Education, School of Pharmacy, Nihon University, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroto SekiDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Chiba, Japan.
Hideaki KawanoFaculty of Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hideto ToDepartment of Medical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Yoshiaki MatsumotoLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, School of Pharmacy, Nihon University, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroyuki HosonoDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP18J23248JSPS KAKENHI JP20K07189Nihon University Multidisciplinary Research Grant for 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a method to apply artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting time-series pharmacokinetics (PKs), and an interpretable the ANN-PK model, which can explain the evidence of prediction by applying Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). A previous population PK (PopPK) model of cyclosporin A was used as the comparison model. The patients' data were used for the ANN-PK model input, and the output by ANN was the clearance (CL). The estimated CL value from the ANN were substituted into the one-compartment with one-order absorption model, the concentrations were calculated, and the parameters of ANN were updated by the back-propagation method. Kernel SHAP was applied to the trained model and the SHAP value of each input was calculated. The root mean squared error for the PopPK model and the ANN-PK model were 41.1 and 31.0 ng/ml, respectively. The goodness of fit plots for the ANN-PK model represented more convergence to y = x compared with that for the PopPK model, with good model performance for the ANN-PK model. The most influential factors on CL output were age and body weight from the evaluation using Kernel SHAP, and these factors were incorporated into the PopPK model as the significant covariates of CL. The ANN-PK model could handle time-series data and showed higher prediction accuracy then the conventional PopPK model, and the scientific validity for the model could be evaluated by applying SHAP. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? A black-box property of an artificial neural network (ANN) decreases the scientific confidence of the model, and making it difficult to utilize the ANN in the medical field. Moreover, difficulty in handling the time-series data is a significant problem for applying the ANN for pharmacometrics study. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? How can we apply the ANN for predicting the time-series pharmacokinetics (PKs) , and confirm the scientific validity of the ANN model? WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? Using the ANN in combination with a conventional compartment (ANN-PK) model enabled to handle the time-series PK data, and the predicting performance of the model was higher than that of the population PK model. Furthermore, we could evaluate the scientific validity of the ANN model by applying the Shapley additive explanations. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE DRUG DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT, AND/OR THERAPEUTICS? We expect that our study will contribute to develop the interpretable ANN model, which can predict the time-series PKs, drug efficacies, and side effects with high prediction performance.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAge FactorsBody WeightCyclosporineFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsCyclosporine

Identifiers

PMID33955705
PMCPMC8302242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.