Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33955573›Full record

ReviewAnimal genetics2021

Evolution of the sheep industry and genetic research in the United States: opportunities for convergence in the twenty-first century.

J W Thorne, B M Murdoch, B A Freking, R R Redden, T W Murphy, J B Taylor, H D Blackburn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Diversity of U.S. Katahdin Hair Sheep.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J W ThorneTexas A&M AgriLife Extension, Texas A&M University, San Angelo, TX, 76901, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-7628
B M MurdochDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83844, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8675-3473
B A FrekingUnited States Meat Animal Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Clay Center, NE, 68933-0166, USA.
R R ReddenTexas A&M AgriLife Extension, Texas A&M University, San Angelo, TX, 76901, USA.
T W MurphyUnited States Meat Animal Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Clay Center, NE, 68933-0166, USA.
J B TaylorUnited States Sheep Experiment Station, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID, 83423, USA.
H D BlackburnNational Animal Germplasm Program, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-1594
Agricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

USDA National Institute of Food IDA01566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous development and application of technology for genetic improvement is a key element for advancing sheep production in the United States. The US sheep industry has contracted over time but appears to be at a juncture where a greater utilization of technology can facilitate industry expansion to new markets and address inefficiencies in traditional production practices. Significant transformations include the increased value of lamb in relation to wool, and a downtrend in large-scale operations but a simultaneous rise in small flocks. Additionally, popularity of hair breeds not requiring shearing has surged, particularly in semi-arid and subtropical US environments. A variety of domestically developed composite breeds and newly established technological approaches are now widely available for the sheep industry to use as it navigates these ongoing transformations. These genetic resources can also address long-targeted areas of improvement such as growth, reproduction and parasite resistance. Moderate progress in production efficiency has been achieved by producers who have employed estimated breeding values, but widespread adoption of this technology has been limited. Genomic marker panels have recently shown promise for reducing disease susceptibility, identifying parentage and providing a foundation for marker-assisted selection. As the ovine genome is further explored and genomic assemblies are improved, the sheep research community in the USA can capitalize on new-found information to develop and apply genetic technologies to improve the production efficiency and profitability of the sheep industry.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBreedingGenetic ResearchAnimalsReproductionSheep, DomesticUnited Statesgenetic diversitygenetic selectiongenomicsOvis ariesproduction systems

Identifiers

PMID33955573
PMCPMC8360125
OpenAlexW3159494465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.