Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33955499›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of oncology2021

Parenteral high‑dose ascorbate - A possible approach for the treatment of glioblastoma (Review).

Olga Renner, Markus Burkard, Holger Michels, Claudia Vollbracht, Tobias Sinnberg, Sascha Venturelli

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Healthy and Diseased Retina Seen through Neuron-Glia Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga RennerDepartment of Nutritional Biochemistry, University of Hohenheim, D‑70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Markus BurkardDepartment of Nutritional Biochemistry, University of Hohenheim, D‑70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Holger MichelsPascoe Pharmazeutische Praeparate GmbH, D‑35394 Giessen, Germany.
Claudia VollbrachtPascoe Pharmazeutische Praeparate GmbH, D‑35394 Giessen, Germany.
Tobias SinnbergDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, D‑72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Sascha VenturelliDepartment of Nutritional Biochemistry, University of Hohenheim, D‑70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
University of Hohenheim · DEPascoe (Germany) · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For glioblastoma, the treatment with standard of care therapy comprising resection, radiation, and temozolomide results in overall survival of approximately 14-18 months after initial diagnosis. Even though several new therapy approaches are under investigation, it is difficult to achieve life prolongation and/or improvement of patient's quality of life. The aggressiveness and progression of glioblastoma is initially orchestrated by the biological complexity of its genetic phenotype and ability to respond to cancer therapy via changing its molecular patterns, thereby developing resistance. Recent clinical studies of pharmacological ascorbate have demonstrated its safety and potential efficacy in different cancer entities regarding patient's quality of life and prolongation of survival. In this review article, the actual glioblastoma treatment possibilities are summarized, the evidence for pharmacological ascorbate in glioblastoma treatment is examined and questions are posed to identify current gaps of knowledge regarding accessibility of ascorbate to the tumor area. Experiments with glioblastoma cell lines and tumor xenografts have demonstrated that high‑dose ascorbate induces cytotoxicity and oxidative stress largely selectively in malignant cells compared to normal cells suggesting ascorbate as a potential therapeutic agent. Further investigations in larger cohorts and randomized placebo‑controlled trials should be performed to confirm these findings as well as to improve delivery strategies to the brain, through the inherent barriers and ultimately to the malignant cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAscorbic AcidBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlioblastomaHumansInfusions, IntravenousMiceOxidative StressPermeabilityQuality of LifeTissue DistributionTreatment OutcomeXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAscorbic Acidastrocytesglioblastomagliomahigh‑dose ascorbatetemozolomidevitamin C

Identifiers

PMID33955499
PMCPMC8104923
OpenAlexW3157738588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.