ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2021
A fragment-based protein interface design algorithm for symmetric assemblies.
Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local structural flexibility drives oligomorphism in computationally designed protein assemblies.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- A suite of designed protein cages using machine learning and protein fragment-based protocols.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2024Article
- A Suite of Designed Protein Cages Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Protein Fragment-Based Protocols.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Fast and versatile sequence-independent protein docking for nanomaterials design using RPXDock.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Engineering Self-Assembling Protein Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Delivery.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Theoretical and experimental advances in protein engineering have led to the creation of precisely defined, novel protein assemblies of great size and complexity, with diverse applications. One powerful approach involves designing a new attachment or binding interface between two simpler symmetric oligomeric protein components. The required methods of design, which present both similarities and key differences compared to problems in protein docking, remain challenging and are not yet routine. With the aim of more fully enabling this emerging area of protein material engineering, we developed a computer program, nanohedra, to introduce two key advances. First, we encoded in the program the construction rules (i.e. the search space parameters) that underlie all possible symmetric material constructions. Second, we developed algorithms for rapidly identifying favorable docking/interface arrangements based on tabulations of empirical patterns of known protein fragment-pair associations. As a result, the candidate poses that nanohedra generates for subsequent amino acid interface design appear highly native-like (at the protein backbone level), while simultaneously conforming to the exacting requirements for symmetry-based assembly. A retrospective computational analysis of successful vs failed experimental studies supports the expectation that this should improve the success rate for this challenging area of protein engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.