Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33955115›Full record

ArticlePsychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society2021

Mental health status of Italian elderly subjects during and after quarantine for the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Gianpaolo Maggi, Ivana Baldassarre, Andrea Barbaro, Nicola Davide Cavallo, Maria Cropano, Raffaele Nappo, Gabriella Santangelo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Steeper memory decline after COVID-19 lockdown measures.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gianpaolo MaggiDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Ivana BaldassarreDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Andrea BarbaroDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Nicola Davide CavalloDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Maria CropanoDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Raffaele NappoDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.
Gabriella SantangeloDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Caserta, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-852X
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe elderly are more vulnerable to COVID-19 and therefore need to adopt long-term social distancing measures. The duration of quarantine impacts the psychological status of the general population. However, until now no study has explored the psychological impact of the pandemic and quarantine together with longitudinal changes in the mental health status of Italian elderly.

methodsAn online questionnaire including an assessment of depression, anxiety, anger, post-traumatic stress, subjective cognitive failures, resilience, coping style, and other dimensions related to the pandemic was completed by participants during (T0) and two months after the end (T1) of the quarantine.

resultsThe sample recruited at T0 included 334 elderly participants. About 45% of the participants experienced depression, anxiety, or anger. Moreover, more fear of getting infected was related to more severe depression, anxiety, and anger, but resilience was found to mediate these relationships. More severe depressive and anger symptoms were related to more severe cognitive failures. No significant difference was observed in mental health scores between T0 and T1. Finally, more severe depression at T0 was associated with the development of post-traumatic stress symptoms at T1.

conclusionsThe fear of getting infected, probably due to perceived vulnerability to disease, seems to play a crucial role in the development of psychological symptoms in the elderly, but resilience seems to mediate the impact of fear. The presence of long-term psychological consequences and the possible risk of developing PTS symptoms in the elderly suggest the need for targeted interventions to reduce possible long-term psychological and cognitive consequences.

Indexed as

COVID-19QuarantineAgedAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHealth StatusHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2cognitive failuresCOVID-19elderlylongitudinal changesmental healthquarantine

Identifiers

PMID33955115
PMCPMC8242477
OpenAlexW3159747612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.