Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33955081›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2021

COVID-19 lockdown and poor sleep quality: Not the whole story.

Valentina Alfonsi, Maurizio Gorgoni, Serena Scarpelli, Pierpaolo Zivi, Stefano Sdoia, Emanuela Mari, Angelo Fraschetti, Fabio Ferlazzo, Anna Maria Giannini, Luigi De Gennaro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dreaming during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina AlfonsiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9929-0399
Maurizio GorgoniDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-5483
Serena ScarpelliDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9260-7111
Pierpaolo ZiviDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Stefano SdoiaDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela MariDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Angelo FraschettiDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-5789
Fabio FerlazzoDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria GianniniDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luigi De GennaroDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3613-6631
Sapienza University of Rome · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence consistently describes the side-effects of coronavirus disease 2019 lockdown on mental health and sleep quality. We conducted a longitudinal web-based survey of 217 Italian participants at two time points: lockdown and subsequent follow-up. To thoroughly investigate lockdown-related changes in sleep quality, we first evaluated variations in overall sleep quality assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. We then examined sleep changes in specific components of sleep quality. Results revealed a clear dissociation of sleep effects, as a function of the specific domain considered, with longer sleep latency, worse sleep efficiency, and massive sleep medication use during forced confinement. On the other hand, we simultaneously observed an increased sleep duration and better daytime functioning. Our present findings highlight the importance of an accurate examination of sleep quality during lockdown, as the effects were not uniform across populations and different sleep domains.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19SleepSleep Wake DisordersAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCOVID-19 lockdowngender biassleep componentssleep quality

Identifiers

PMID33955081
PMCPMC8236908
OpenAlexW3158615358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.