Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33954911›Full record

Observational studyJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2021

Population pharmacodynamic modeling of intramuscular and oral dexamethasone and betamethasone effects on six biomarkers with circadian complexities in Indian women.

Wojciech Krzyzanski, Mark A Milad, Alan H Jobe, Thomas Peppard, Robert R Bies, William J Jusko

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Systematic review: differences in complete blood count component rhythms.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wojciech KrzyzanskiSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Mark A MiladMilad Pharmaceutical Consulting LLC, Plymouth, MI, USA.
Alan H JobeDivision of Pulmonary Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Thomas PeppardCertara, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Robert R BiesSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
William J JuskoSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. wjjusko@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-0550
New York University · USBuffalo Society of Natural Sciences · USCertara (United States) · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Mechanistic Pharmacokinetics and PharmacodynamicsR35GM131800 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J. · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-019894NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131800NIH HHS GM131800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis was performed for extensive data for differing dosage forms and routes for dexamethasone (DEX) and betamethasone (BET) in 48 healthy nonpregnant Indian women in a partial and complex cross-over design. Single doses of 6 mg dexamethasone phosphate (DEX-P), betamethasone phosphate (BET-P), or 1:1 mixture of betamethasone phosphate and acetate (BET-PA) were administered orally (PO) or intramuscularly (IM) where each woman enrolled in a two-period cross-over study. Plasma concentrations collected over 96 h were described with a two-compartment model with differing PO and IM first-order absorption inputs. Overall, BET exhibited slower clearance, similar volume of distribution, faster absorption, and longer persistence than DEX with BET acetate producing extremely slow absorption but full bioavailability of BET. Six biomarkers were assessed over a 24-h baseline period with four showing circadian rhythms with complex baselines. These baselines and the strong responses seen after drug dosing were fitted with various indirect response models using the Laplace estimation methods in NONMEM 7.4. Both the PK and six biomarker responses were well-described with modest variability likely due to the homogeneous ages, weights, and ethnicities of the women. The drugs either inhibited or stimulated the influx processes with some models requiring joint inclusion of drug effects on circadian cortisol suppression. The biomarkers and order of sensitivity (lowest IC

Indexed as

ChronopharmacokineticsModels, BiologicalAdministration, OralAdultBetamethasoneBiomarkersCircadian RhythmCross-Over StudiesDexamethasoneDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHalf-LifeHealthy VolunteersHumansIndiaInhibitory Concentration 50BetamethasoneBiomarkersDexamethasoneAdrenal suppressionBetamethasoneCell traffickingDexamethasonePharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsPopulation modeling

Identifiers

PMID33954911
PMCPMC8099395
OpenAlexW3157269614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.