ArticleImmunologic research2021
Role of clinicopathological features for the early prediction of prognosis in lupus nephritis.
Article in Immunologic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Representation of multimorbidity and frailty in the development and validation of kidney failure prognostic prediction models: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Development of a prognostic nomogram for long-term renal function in chronic kidney disease patients on the basis of clinicopathologic parameters.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Role of crescents for lupus nephritis in clinical, pathological and prognosis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Searching for a prognostic index in lupus nephritis.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ambiguities remain regarding the role of clinicopathological characteristics in the early prediction of the prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN). Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who completed routine follow-up were identified and retrospectively reviewed for eligible cases. Poor prognosis was defined as all-cause mortality or a persistent decrease of eGFR greater than half the baseline level or progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). An optimal Cox regression model was constructed for the early prediction of a poor prognosis for LN. Among the 2163 SLE patients, 376 eligible LN cases were enrolled in the study, with a median follow-up time of 55 [27.0, 87.0] months. The male-to-female ratio was 1:7.2, and 37 patients (9.8%) progressed to the composite endpoint. The ISN/RPS class was significantly associated with proteinuria levels (P-value < 0.001), and class IV/IV + V patients, but not class V patients, had the most severe proteinuria. Our optimal multivariate Cox regression model indicated that sex, ISN/RPS class, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, serum albumin, tertiles of proteinuria, and their interaction were independently associated with a poor prognosis. ROC analysis and external validation demonstrated that our model was efficient and robust for distinguishing LN patients with a poor prognosis. Our study constructed a robust and early predictive model for convenience in clinical practice to identify poor prognosis in LN patients. We found a significant interaction effect between proteinuria and serum albumin for the prediction of poor prognosis. LN patients with low-level proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia exhibit an increased hazard of progression to poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.