Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33954888›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2022

Predictors and Reasons Why Patients Decline to Participate in Home Hospital: a Mixed Methods Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

David M Levine, Mary Paz, Kimberly Burke, Jeffrey L Schnipper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03203759 (Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03203759 nacompletednot on this map

Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled91ConditionsInfection, Heart Failure, COPD, AsthmaArmsHome hospitalization, Traditional inpatient hospitalization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Virtual Wards for Acute Care Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Patients' experiences of receiving hospital care from a mobile care unit - a qualitative interview study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David M LevineDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. dmlevine@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4337-9896
Mary PazDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kimberly BurkeUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Jeffrey L SchnipperDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute care at home ("home hospital") compared to traditional hospital care has been shown to lower cost, utilization, and readmission and improve patient experience and physical activity. Despite these benefits, many patients decline to enroll in home hospital.

objectiveDescribe predictors and reasons why patients decline home hospital.

designMixed methods evaluation of a randomized controlled trial.

participantsPatients in the emergency department who required admission and were accepted for home hospital by the home hospital attending, but ultimately declined to enroll.

interventionHome hospital care, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous medications, remote monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing. APPROACH: We conducted a thematic content analysis of verbatim reasons for decline. We performed bivariate comparisons then multivariable logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with declining participation. KEY

resultsTwo hundred forty-eight patients were eligible to enroll, and 157 (63%) declined enrollment. Patients who declined and enrolled were of similar age (median age, 74 vs 75 years old; p = 0.27), sex (32% vs 36% female; p = 0.49), and race/ethnicity (p = 0.26). In multivariable analysis, patients were significantly more likely to decline if they initially presented at the community hospital compared to the academic medical center (53% vs 42%; adjusted OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2 to 4.2]) and if single (37% v 24%; adjusted OR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2 to 5.1]). We formulated 10 qualitative categories describing reasons patients ultimately declined. Many patients declined because they felt it was easier to remain in the hospital (20%) or felt safer in the hospital than in their home (20%).

conclusionsPatients who declined to enroll in a home hospital intervention had similar sociodemographic characteristics as enrollees except partner status and declined most often for perceptions surrounding safety at home and the ease of remaining in the hospital.

trial registrationNCT03203759.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesAgedCritical CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, CommunityHumansMalehome hospitalhospital at homerefusal

Identifiers

PMID33954888
PMCPMC8811077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.