Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33954882›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Determinants of surveillance for late effects in childhood cancer survivors: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Jennifer Shuldiner, Nida Shah, Ann Marie Corrado, David Hodgson, Paul C Nathan, Noah Ivers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer ShuldinerWomen's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. jennifer.shuldiner@wchospital.ca.
Nida ShahThe Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Marie CorradoThe Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David HodgsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul C NathanThe Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Noah IversWomen's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 169702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost adult survivors of childhood cancer do not complete the recommended surveillance tests for late effects of their treatment. We used a theory-informed method to elucidate the barriers and enablers among childhood cancer survivors to accessing such tests.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were completed with adult survivors of childhood cancer. Participants were eligible for the surveillance tests of interest (echocardiogram, mammogram/breast MRI and/or colonoscopy) but had not attended a specialised aftercare clinic in over five years. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a tool specifically developed for implementation research to identify influences on desired behaviour(s), informed the interview guide and analysis; interview transcripts were coded line-by-line and mapped to domains in accordance with the framework.

resultsThirty childhood cancer survivors were interviewed (ages 25-60). The TDF domains described by survivors included: intention to complete the tests, which was facilitated by the fear of another cancer (emotion), confidence in the benefits of early detection (beliefs about consequences), and supportive reminders (memory, attention, and decision-making). In contrast, a lack of knowledge of late effects and relevant guidelines and the burden of arranging tests (social identity) were key barriers.

conclusionInterventions seeking to increase surveillance testing for late effects may be more effective if they feature components that explicitly address all the theory-informed determinants identified. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Awareness about the recommendations among survivors and their physicians is a necessary (but likely not sufficient) step towards implementation of guidelines regarding surveillance for late effects.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdultChildHealth ServicesHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurvivorsChildhood cancerLate effectsQualitative researchSurveillanceSurvivorshipTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.